How Much is Fiscal Consolidation Offset by Increases in Social Safety Net Spending? Evidence from the 2011 Budget Control Act

Abstract This paper investigates how much reductions in federal procurement spending due to the Budget Control Act of 2011 are offset or “crowded out” by increases in spending on social safety net programs. We use a shift-share instrumental variables approach and find that approximately 7 % of the cuts in federal spending are offset by social safety net transfers. Specifically, for every dollar reduction in federal procurement, there is an increase of $0.06 in unemployment insurance payments and less than $0.01 in SNAP benefits. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that these effects vary significantly with the type of spending that is cut. These findings underscore the broader implications of fiscal adjustments, highlighting the potential consequences for state policies and employer costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2025-0073
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Much is Fiscal Consolidation Offset by Increases in Social Safety Net Spending? Evidence from the 2011 Budget Control Act

Kendall Stephenson, Timothy M. Komarek, Vinicius Curti Cícero
The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
article

How Much is Fiscal Consolidation Offset by Increases in Social Safety Net Spending? Evidence from the 2011 Budget Control Act

Kendall Stephenson, Timothy M. Komarek, Vinicius Curti Cícero
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates how much reductions in federal procurement spending due to the Budget Control Act of 2011 are offset or “crowded out” by increases in spending on social safety net programs. We use a shift-share instrumental variables approach and find that approximately 7 % of the cuts in federal spending are offset by social safety net transfers. Specifically, for every dollar reduction in federal procurement, there is an increase of $0.06 in unemployment insurance payments and less than $0.01 in SNAP benefits. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that these effects vary significantly with the type of spending that is cut. These findings underscore the broader implications of fiscal adjustments, highlighting the potential consequences for state policies and employer costs.

The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Denison University (US), Colorado State University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.