Methodological and Ethical Considerations in LGBTQ-Focused Online Ethnographic Research: A Systematic Review and a Human-Centered Framework

Online ethnography is a qualitative research approach particularly effective for studying marginalized or vulnerable communities that are often difficult for researchers to access. This approach is especially relevant for LGBTQ communities, where members often form connections and build communities online. To advance current understanding of online ethnography for LGBTQ populations, this systematic review collected and analyzed 62 Web of Science-indexed LGBTQ-focused online ethnographic studies that directly involve LGBTQ individuals as participants or explicitly examine LGBTQ-related issues. Specifically, this systematic review examines and discusses seven aspects of methodological practices and four ethical considerations. The seven methodological aspects cover populations, online sites, sampling, data collection, data analysis, researcher positionality and reflexivity, and methods for ensuring research rigor. The four ethical considerations include informed consent, respect and trust, privacy and confidentiality, and data security and reuse. Based on the review findings, the authors propose a human-centered framework for conducting LGBTQ-focused online ethnographic research. The authors also identify gaps in current LGBTQ-focused online ethnographic research and propose future directions to enhance methodological rigor, ethical compliance, and the beneficial impact of online ethnography for LGBTQ populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251411167
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological and Ethical Considerations in LGBTQ-Focused Online Ethnographic Research: A Systematic Review and a Human-Centered Framework

Shengang Wang, N.S. Wang, Wan-Chen Lee
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Methodological and Ethical Considerations in LGBTQ-Focused Online Ethnographic Research: A Systematic Review and a Human-Centered Framework

Shengang Wang, N.S. Wang, Wan-Chen Lee
article en

Abstract

Online ethnography is a qualitative research approach particularly effective for studying marginalized or vulnerable communities that are often difficult for researchers to access. This approach is especially relevant for LGBTQ communities, where members often form connections and build communities online. To advance current understanding of online ethnography for LGBTQ populations, this systematic review collected and analyzed 62 Web of Science-indexed LGBTQ-focused online ethnographic studies that directly involve LGBTQ individuals as participants or explicitly examine LGBTQ-related issues. Specifically, this systematic review examines and discusses seven aspects of methodological practices and four ethical considerations. The seven methodological aspects cover populations, online sites, sampling, data collection, data analysis, researcher positionality and reflexivity, and methods for ensuring research rigor. The four ethical considerations include informed consent, respect and trust, privacy and confidentiality, and data security and reuse. Based on the review findings, the authors propose a human-centered framework for conducting LGBTQ-focused online ethnographic research. The authors also identify gaps in current LGBTQ-focused online ethnographic research and propose future directions to enhance methodological rigor, ethical compliance, and the beneficial impact of online ethnography for LGBTQ populations.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 25
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.