Race, Religiosity, and Neuroticism: Influences on End-of-Life Readiness in Later Life

Abstract End of life (EOL) care planning, or preparing for future medical decisions and preferences, is essential for promoting autonomy and quality care in later life. Unfortunately, many individuals delay or avoid this process. This study examined how psychological factors specifically race, racial centrality, religiosity, and neuroticism relate to both EOL planning mindsets and behaviors among older American adults (n = 467; ages 60-88). Data was collected online via Prolific in summer 2025. Participants completed surveys assessing psychological readiness (mindset), planning actions (behavior), personality traits, religious reliance, and racial identity. EOL mindset refers to how psychologically ready or comfortable individuals feel discussing death, while behaviors reflect concrete actions like creating a will or naming a decision-maker. Correlational analyses and t-tests revealed that Black participants reported greater psychological readiness for EOL planning than White participants. Among Black individuals, higher racial centrality was associated with stronger EOL mindsets, suggesting that cultural identity may serve as a motivating or protective factor. Religiosity was also positively associated with the EOL mindset, indicating that spiritual frameworks may enhance emotional comfort with end-of-life discussions. In contrast, neuroticism was linked to both lower EOL readiness and fewer completed planning behaviors, highlighting how emotional vulnerability may act as a barrier to both mindset and action. These findings suggest that sociocultural and psychological factors shape how older adults approach end-of-life planning. For healthcare institutions, these results emphasize the importance of developing culturally responsive and emotionally attuned interventions that foster both readiness in EOL care planning across aging populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.4180
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Race, Religiosity, and Neuroticism: Influences on End-of-Life Readiness in Later Life

Patrick L. Hill, Mary Foster Cox, Satvika Boyina
Innovation in Aging
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
article

Race, Religiosity, and Neuroticism: Influences on End-of-Life Readiness in Later Life

Patrick L. Hill, Mary Foster Cox, Satvika Boyina
article en

Abstract

Abstract End of life (EOL) care planning, or preparing for future medical decisions and preferences, is essential for promoting autonomy and quality care in later life. Unfortunately, many individuals delay or avoid this process. This study examined how psychological factors specifically race, racial centrality, religiosity, and neuroticism relate to both EOL planning mindsets and behaviors among older American adults (n = 467; ages 60-88). Data was collected online via Prolific in summer 2025. Participants completed surveys assessing psychological readiness (mindset), planning actions (behavior), personality traits, religious reliance, and racial identity. EOL mindset refers to how psychologically ready or comfortable individuals feel discussing death, while behaviors reflect concrete actions like creating a will or naming a decision-maker. Correlational analyses and t-tests revealed that Black participants reported greater psychological readiness for EOL planning than White participants. Among Black individuals, higher racial centrality was associated with stronger EOL mindsets, suggesting that cultural identity may serve as a motivating or protective factor. Religiosity was also positively associated with the EOL mindset, indicating that spiritual frameworks may enhance emotional comfort with end-of-life discussions. In contrast, neuroticism was linked to both lower EOL readiness and fewer completed planning behaviors, highlighting how emotional vulnerability may act as a barrier to both mindset and action. These findings suggest that sociocultural and psychological factors shape how older adults approach end-of-life planning. For healthcare institutions, these results emphasize the importance of developing culturally responsive and emotionally attuned interventions that foster both readiness in EOL care planning across aging populations.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Race, Religiosity, and Neuroticism: Influences on End-of-Life Readiness in Later Life — Patrick L. Hill, Mary Foster Cox, et al. · Innovation in Aging (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS