High Intensity-Rehabilitation in Skilled Nursing Facilities: From Theory to Practice

Abstract Implementing evidence-based, physiologic dosing of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) is essential to improve functional outcomes in a vulnerable, medically-complex population. We evaluated an implementation program to promote high-intensity resistance rehabilitation (HIR) in SNFs. Methods Using a prospective convergent mixed-methods design, this study 1) measured proximal (clinician knowledge, self-efficacy, and HIR perspective) and distal (HIR adoption and implementation) outcomes; 2) explored how the program influenced distal outcomes (program processes); and 3) investigated clinician factors influencing HIR implementation. Thirty-eight rehabilitation clinicians and 16 leaders in eight rural Department of Veterans Affairs SNFs participated in interviews and focus groups. Outcomes included validated questionnaires on HIR perspective (Perceived Characteristics of Intervention Scale) and adoption (Commitment to Change Scale), and study-specific questionnaires on clinician HIR knowledge, self-efficacy, and implementation. Results The program improved clinician HIR knowledge, self-efficacy, and perspective and led to acceptable adoption rates; however, implementation was marginally affected. Only clinician HIR perspective correlated with adoption (rho = 0.47, p = 0.004). The program supported distal outcomes by keeping HIR at the forefront of clinicians’ mind, fostering positive outcome expectations, and enhancing team cohesion and accountability. Clinician creativity, adaptability, resilience, professional discipline, and previous experience influenced implementation. Conclusion The program influenced HIR adoption primarily by enhancing clinicians’ positive perspectives of HIR. Future efforts could strengthen implementation by fostering team cohesion, accountability, and clinician creativity while assessing environmental factors influencing implementation. Strategies that enhance clinician perspective and creativity, maintain HIR top of mind, and foster team cohesion and accountability may improve adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2448
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High Intensity-Rehabilitation in Skilled Nursing Facilities: From Theory to Practice

Elizabeth W. Staton, Dawn Magnusson, Mattie Pontiff, Katie A. Butera et al.
Innovation in Aging
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

High Intensity-Rehabilitation in Skilled Nursing Facilities: From Theory to Practice

Elizabeth W. Staton, Dawn Magnusson, Mattie Pontiff, Katie A. Butera, Jennifer E. Stevens‐Lapsley, Lauren Hinrichs-Kinney, Emma Beisheim-Ryan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Implementing evidence-based, physiologic dosing of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) is essential to improve functional outcomes in a vulnerable, medically-complex population. We evaluated an implementation program to promote high-intensity resistance rehabilitation (HIR) in SNFs. Methods Using a prospective convergent mixed-methods design, this study 1) measured proximal (clinician knowledge, self-efficacy, and HIR perspective) and distal (HIR adoption and implementation) outcomes; 2) explored how the program influenced distal outcomes (program processes); and 3) investigated clinician factors influencing HIR implementation. Thirty-eight rehabilitation clinicians and 16 leaders in eight rural Department of Veterans Affairs SNFs participated in interviews and focus groups. Outcomes included validated questionnaires on HIR perspective (Perceived Characteristics of Intervention Scale) and adoption (Commitment to Change Scale), and study-specific questionnaires on clinician HIR knowledge, self-efficacy, and implementation. Results The program improved clinician HIR knowledge, self-efficacy, and perspective and led to acceptable adoption rates; however, implementation was marginally affected. Only clinician HIR perspective correlated with adoption (rho = 0.47, p = 0.004). The program supported distal outcomes by keeping HIR at the forefront of clinicians’ mind, fostering positive outcome expectations, and enhancing team cohesion and accountability. Clinician creativity, adaptability, resilience, professional discipline, and previous experience influenced implementation. Conclusion The program influenced HIR adoption primarily by enhancing clinicians’ positive perspectives of HIR. Future efforts could strengthen implementation by fostering team cohesion, accountability, and clinician creativity while assessing environmental factors influencing implementation. Strategies that enhance clinician perspective and creativity, maintain HIR top of mind, and foster team cohesion and accountability may improve adoption.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Naval Medical Center San Diego (US), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.