Negotiating HIV Protection in the Era of Online Dating and Pre-Exposure-Prophylaxis (PrEP): Insights into How Men Having Sex with Men (MSM) Living in Switzerland Negotiate their HIV Protection with Non-steady Partners

HIV protection depends on the consent and cooperation of sexual partners, which requires negotiation. Early HIV-related research identified condom negotiation strategies. However, strategies used specifically among men having sex with men (MSM) remained underexamined. This project explored how HIV-negative MSM negotiate their protection from HIV when having sex with non-steady partners, considering current risk reduction practices, the availability of several effective biomedical prevention options, the strong presence of STIs and prevailing online dating. We conducted in-person interviews with a maximum variation sample of 29 MSM, aged 21–80, combining narrative interviewing with a virtual-reality serious game and a series of standardized questions. We analyzed the interview data using content analysis, combining deductive and inductive approaches. We identified three categories of negotiation strategies used in chats, during in-person dates or when having sex: (i) subject-centered strategies anchored in the will and determination of MSM; (ii) strategies centered on sexual arousal, asserting MSM’s preferred protection strategy; (iii) strategies centered on risk communication. Further, we identified actions that interrupt negotiations and directly enforce protection or bypass negotiations. Participants combined several strategies during negotiations. The strategies also demonstrated versatility: most were used for various aims and were not systematically related to a specific personal protection strategy. This study posits an elaborate range of HIV-protection negotiation strategies used by MSM, including strategies not previously described. It contributes to a more nuanced understanding of negotiation strategies and encourages prevention professionals to reflect on the attention given to negotiation strategies in prevention offers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality & Culture
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-025-10505-2
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating HIV Protection in the Era of Online Dating and Pre-Exposure-Prophylaxis (PrEP): Insights into How Men Having Sex with Men (MSM) Living in Switzerland Negotiate their HIV Protection with Non-steady Partners

Daniel Gredig, Patrick Weber, Jasmina Bogdanović, Daniele Bigoni
Sexuality & Culture
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Negotiating HIV Protection in the Era of Online Dating and Pre-Exposure-Prophylaxis (PrEP): Insights into How Men Having Sex with Men (MSM) Living in Switzerland Negotiate their HIV Protection with Non-steady Partners

Daniel Gredig, Patrick Weber, Jasmina Bogdanović, Daniele Bigoni
article en

Abstract

HIV protection depends on the consent and cooperation of sexual partners, which requires negotiation. Early HIV-related research identified condom negotiation strategies. However, strategies used specifically among men having sex with men (MSM) remained underexamined. This project explored how HIV-negative MSM negotiate their protection from HIV when having sex with non-steady partners, considering current risk reduction practices, the availability of several effective biomedical prevention options, the strong presence of STIs and prevailing online dating. We conducted in-person interviews with a maximum variation sample of 29 MSM, aged 21–80, combining narrative interviewing with a virtual-reality serious game and a series of standardized questions. We analyzed the interview data using content analysis, combining deductive and inductive approaches. We identified three categories of negotiation strategies used in chats, during in-person dates or when having sex: (i) subject-centered strategies anchored in the will and determination of MSM; (ii) strategies centered on sexual arousal, asserting MSM’s preferred protection strategy; (iii) strategies centered on risk communication. Further, we identified actions that interrupt negotiations and directly enforce protection or bypass negotiations. Participants combined several strategies during negotiations. The strategies also demonstrated versatility: most were used for various aims and were not systematically related to a specific personal protection strategy. This study posits an elaborate range of HIV-protection negotiation strategies used by MSM, including strategies not previously described. It contributes to a more nuanced understanding of negotiation strategies and encourages prevention professionals to reflect on the attention given to negotiation strategies in prevention offers.

Sexuality & Culture
FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH)
National Science Foundation, Northwestern University, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Gender equality, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.