Examining the Measurement Invariance of TIMSS Science Self-Concept Scales Across Genders, Cultures, and Languages

This study employed item response theory (IRT), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine the measurement invariance of TIMSS science self-concept (SSC) scales for grades 4 and 8 across genders, cultures, and languages in six countries and regions. IRT, and EFA and CFA were utilized to examine the reliability and validity of the SSC scales, respectively. The IRT results revealed substantial variation in each item and test information function values across the six societies. The EFA and CFA results identified two dimensions of SSC scales, that is, positive perception of SSC (SSCp) and negative perception of SSC (SSCn), with satisfactory fit indices. Measurement invariance was confirmed across genders, and cultural and linguistic groups. Recommendations are put forward for TIMSS program developers and researchers regarding the revision of the SSC scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829251414532
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Measurement Invariance of TIMSS Science Self-Concept Scales Across Genders, Cultures, and Languages

Jinyan Huang, Ying Liu
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Examining the Measurement Invariance of TIMSS Science Self-Concept Scales Across Genders, Cultures, and Languages

Jinyan Huang, Ying Liu
article en

Abstract

This study employed item response theory (IRT), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine the measurement invariance of TIMSS science self-concept (SSC) scales for grades 4 and 8 across genders, cultures, and languages in six countries and regions. IRT, and EFA and CFA were utilized to examine the reliability and validity of the SSC scales, respectively. The IRT results revealed substantial variation in each item and test information function values across the six societies. The EFA and CFA results identified two dimensions of SSC scales, that is, positive perception of SSC (SSCp) and negative perception of SSC (SSCn), with satisfactory fit indices. Measurement invariance was confirmed across genders, and cultural and linguistic groups. Recommendations are put forward for TIMSS program developers and researchers regarding the revision of the SSC scales.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Center for Assessment (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Examining the Measurement Invariance of TIMSS Science Self-Concept Scales Across Genders, Cultures, and Languages — Jinyan Huang, Ying Liu · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS