Age Differences in the Use of Written Materials During Healthcare Visits

Abstract Prior to healthcare choices, people often search for information online, compile self-collected health data, or write down questions and priorities. Such patient-generated lists and agendas have potential benefits for streamlining healthcare decisions but may also derail patient-physician communication by introducing extraneous detail. It remains unclear whether older adults are more likely than younger adults to prepare written materials, as they are generally less likely to engage in pre-decisional information-seeking, but more likely to use external memory aids, and more likely to manage complex health conditions that would benefit from written documentation. To address this question, an adult lifespan sample (n = 457; Mage = 51.50; SDage = 19.00, aged 18-99 years) completed a pre-registered online survey assessing demographics, personality, health status, health-related attitudes, the timing of their most recent healthcare visit, and whether they brought written material to the visit. Logistic regressions revealed that those who brought written materials were significantly older (p < .01) and more likely to be male (p < .05). They also scored higher on neuroticism and reported more recent healthcare visits, a higher importance of being informed about their health, but a lower understanding of their health condition (all ps<.05). None of the other covariates showed significant associations with using written materials. Further research is needed to examine potential implications of older adults’ use of written materials for healthcare outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1400
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age Differences in the Use of Written Materials During Healthcare Visits

Mark S. Lachs, Tess Wild, Corinna E. Löckenhoff
Innovation in Aging
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Age Differences in the Use of Written Materials During Healthcare Visits

Mark S. Lachs, Tess Wild, Corinna E. Löckenhoff
article en

Abstract

Abstract Prior to healthcare choices, people often search for information online, compile self-collected health data, or write down questions and priorities. Such patient-generated lists and agendas have potential benefits for streamlining healthcare decisions but may also derail patient-physician communication by introducing extraneous detail. It remains unclear whether older adults are more likely than younger adults to prepare written materials, as they are generally less likely to engage in pre-decisional information-seeking, but more likely to use external memory aids, and more likely to manage complex health conditions that would benefit from written documentation. To address this question, an adult lifespan sample (n = 457; Mage = 51.50; SDage = 19.00, aged 18-99 years) completed a pre-registered online survey assessing demographics, personality, health status, health-related attitudes, the timing of their most recent healthcare visit, and whether they brought written material to the visit. Logistic regressions revealed that those who brought written materials were significantly older (p < .01) and more likely to be male (p < .05). They also scored higher on neuroticism and reported more recent healthcare visits, a higher importance of being informed about their health, but a lower understanding of their health condition (all ps<.05). None of the other covariates showed significant associations with using written materials. Further research is needed to examine potential implications of older adults’ use of written materials for healthcare outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Cornell University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.