Speakers' perceptions about invisible anglicisms in Italian

In order to contribute to the study of anglicisms with respect to their ‘invisibility’ in the receiving language, this paper presents the results of a survey focused on speakers' perceptions about the use of English loan translations and semantic loans in Italian. Using age as a variable, the informants of the survey were divided into three age groups, – millennials (30-44), generation X (45-60) and boomers (over 60) – in order to establish which indirect borrowings of the sample were considered acceptable or not, whether their ‘Englishness’ was detected and which choice they would make between an Italian word and an indirect borrowing. The tested items were chosen among words and patterns recognized as English indirect borrowings in the literature, including lexical, morphosyntactic and phraseological patterns. The results of the survey show the acceptance of items such as, for example evidenze (evidence), the use of coordinated prepositions da e per (to and from), the multiple interrogative Chi è chi e chi fa cosa (who’s who and who does what), irrespective of age. In addition, there is a general agreement on considering the verb applicare (modelled on English to apply), widely used in administrative discourse, alien to standard Italian. However, the data also confirms that younger speakers are more open to the use of loan translations and semantic loans than older speakers, and are less aware of the influence of English, supporting the trend towards the gradual assimilation of indirect borrowings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8987/11929
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Speakers' perceptions about invisible anglicisms in Italian

Stefania Cicillini, Virginia Pulcini
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Speakers' perceptions about invisible anglicisms in Italian

Stefania Cicillini, Virginia Pulcini
article en

Abstract

In order to contribute to the study of anglicisms with respect to their ‘invisibility’ in the receiving language, this paper presents the results of a survey focused on speakers' perceptions about the use of English loan translations and semantic loans in Italian. Using age as a variable, the informants of the survey were divided into three age groups, – millennials (30-44), generation X (45-60) and boomers (over 60) – in order to establish which indirect borrowings of the sample were considered acceptable or not, whether their ‘Englishness’ was detected and which choice they would make between an Italian word and an indirect borrowing. The tested items were chosen among words and patterns recognized as English indirect borrowings in the literature, including lexical, morphosyntactic and phraseological patterns. The results of the survey show the acceptance of items such as, for example evidenze (evidence), the use of coordinated prepositions da e per (to and from), the multiple interrogative Chi è chi e chi fa cosa (who’s who and who does what), irrespective of age. In addition, there is a general agreement on considering the verb applicare (modelled on English to apply), widely used in administrative discourse, alien to standard Italian. However, the data also confirms that younger speakers are more open to the use of loan translations and semantic loans than older speakers, and are less aware of the influence of English, supporting the trend towards the gradual assimilation of indirect borrowings.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.