Mixed Methods Analysis of State Policies on Care Planning and Family Engagement in Assisted Living

Abstract Involving family in care planning is a person-centered care strategy that enhances assisted living (AL) residents, families, and staff well-being. This study analyzes AL care planning and family engagement requirements through a health services regulatory analysis of 256 AL licenses across all 50 states and DC associated with 37190 ALs in 2023. Using a mixed methods approach, we examined license requirements for the presence and qualitative context of family engagement in care planning, staff training on family involvement, and person-centered care. Nearly 80% of ALs were required to have care plans. A larger share of ALs designated for memory care (MC) had family engagement requirements (47%) compared to non-memory care ALs (32.1%). Half of licenses encourage family engagement in care planning, while the remainder used passive language about ensuring family roles or encouraging involvement in activities. Person-centered care policies were less common, appearing more often in MC licenses. Only licenses in 3 states emphasized respecting individuals’ cultural and ethnic values in care planning and staff training. Qualitative analysis identified the following categories in family engagement: providing direct care, and involvement in care planning and legal aspects (e.g., lease, payment). Person-centeredness was described in the context of care planning and staff training. The level of specificity and stringency of these categories ranged from passive to detailed and directive. These findings provide the first comprehensive profile of AL care planning requirements, establishing baseline data for future outcome evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3813
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed Methods Analysis of State Policies on Care Planning and Family Engagement in Assisted Living

Paula Carder, Lindsey Smith, Cassandra Hua, Eric Jutkowitz et al.
Innovation in Aging
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Mixed Methods Analysis of State Policies on Care Planning and Family Engagement in Assisted Living

Paula Carder, Lindsey Smith, Cassandra Hua, Eric Jutkowitz, Erh-Chi Hsu, Adam Pennavaria
article en

Abstract

Abstract Involving family in care planning is a person-centered care strategy that enhances assisted living (AL) residents, families, and staff well-being. This study analyzes AL care planning and family engagement requirements through a health services regulatory analysis of 256 AL licenses across all 50 states and DC associated with 37190 ALs in 2023. Using a mixed methods approach, we examined license requirements for the presence and qualitative context of family engagement in care planning, staff training on family involvement, and person-centered care. Nearly 80% of ALs were required to have care plans. A larger share of ALs designated for memory care (MC) had family engagement requirements (47%) compared to non-memory care ALs (32.1%). Half of licenses encourage family engagement in care planning, while the remainder used passive language about ensuring family roles or encouraging involvement in activities. Person-centered care policies were less common, appearing more often in MC licenses. Only licenses in 3 states emphasized respecting individuals’ cultural and ethnic values in care planning and staff training. Qualitative analysis identified the following categories in family engagement: providing direct care, and involvement in care planning and legal aspects (e.g., lease, payment). Person-centeredness was described in the context of care planning and staff training. The level of specificity and stringency of these categories ranged from passive to detailed and directive. These findings provide the first comprehensive profile of AL care planning requirements, establishing baseline data for future outcome evaluations.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Portland State University (US), University of Minnesota (US), University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of Minnesota System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.