What makes a peer supporter competent? A bottom-up cross-culturally informed multi-method study

Abstract Peer support is increasingly recognised as an important person-centred means of facilitating mental well-being among older adults. Enhancing competencies among Peer Supporters (PS) and any service provider is crucial to ensuring quality service. Yet, there is limited knowledge concerning what a PS’s core competencies are from the perspectives of multiple key stakeholders and how they could be aptly assessed. We conducted a three-round bottom-up Delphi study involving 30 PS (≥50 years), 14 service users (≥60 years), and 23 social workers/project officers to develop a PS core competency framework. This was followed by constructing a self-rated Peer Supporter Competence Scale (PSCS) for the local population. The psychometric properties of the PSCS were examined in 340 trained PS from a territory-wide community-based stepped-care intervention service for older adults with depressive symptoms in Hong Kong. Thirty-five core competencies were identified with five overarching themes: ‘Self and self-development’, ‘General work ethics’, ‘Work with others’, ‘Work with service users’ (encompassing ‘Interpersonal attitude and skills’, ‘Risk management’, and ‘Recovery facilitation’), and ‘Peer support knowledge’. 14.3% were unique to the local context, 20% had conceptual origins in the West, and 65.7% were shared across cultures. Following standard scale development and validation procedures, the final scale for PS competence assessment comprised 16 items (PSCS-16), demonstrating good reliability (α = 0.84) and convergent validity (r = 0.40 with the General Self-Efficacy Scale, p < 0.001). These findings have implications for enhancing peer support training and demonstrate the feasibility of developing a culturally-informed measure of PS competence using a bottom-up approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2720
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What makes a peer supporter competent? A bottom-up cross-culturally informed multi-method study

Edwin Lok Yan Wong, Eric Chi‐Ho Kwok, Yi Leung, Dara Kiu et al.
Innovation in Aging
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

What makes a peer supporter competent? A bottom-up cross-culturally informed multi-method study

Edwin Lok Yan Wong, Eric Chi‐Ho Kwok, Yi Leung, Dara Kiu, Gloria Hoi, Wai Chi Chan, Yin Ling Irene Wong, Terry Lum, Stephanie Ming, Yan Wong
article en

Abstract

Abstract Peer support is increasingly recognised as an important person-centred means of facilitating mental well-being among older adults. Enhancing competencies among Peer Supporters (PS) and any service provider is crucial to ensuring quality service. Yet, there is limited knowledge concerning what a PS’s core competencies are from the perspectives of multiple key stakeholders and how they could be aptly assessed. We conducted a three-round bottom-up Delphi study involving 30 PS (≥50 years), 14 service users (≥60 years), and 23 social workers/project officers to develop a PS core competency framework. This was followed by constructing a self-rated Peer Supporter Competence Scale (PSCS) for the local population. The psychometric properties of the PSCS were examined in 340 trained PS from a territory-wide community-based stepped-care intervention service for older adults with depressive symptoms in Hong Kong. Thirty-five core competencies were identified with five overarching themes: ‘Self and self-development’, ‘General work ethics’, ‘Work with others’, ‘Work with service users’ (encompassing ‘Interpersonal attitude and skills’, ‘Risk management’, and ‘Recovery facilitation’), and ‘Peer support knowledge’. 14.3% were unique to the local context, 20% had conceptual origins in the West, and 65.7% were shared across cultures. Following standard scale development and validation procedures, the final scale for PS competence assessment comprised 16 items (PSCS-16), demonstrating good reliability (α = 0.84) and convergent validity (r = 0.40 with the General Self-Efficacy Scale, p < 0.001). These findings have implications for enhancing peer support training and demonstrate the feasibility of developing a culturally-informed measure of PS competence using a bottom-up approach.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Birmingham City University (GB), University College Birmingham (GB), University of Reading (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.