Impact of Collaborative Learning on Adolescents’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Their Prevention

Abstract Background: Adolescents, particularly those aged 15–24, account for nearly half of new sexually transmitted disease (STD) cases globally. Limited awareness and persistent misconceptions highlight the need for effective, adolescent-friendly education. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured collaborative learning intervention in enhancing STD-related knowledge, attitudes, and preventive intentions among college-going adolescents. Methods: A quasi-experimental, one-group pretest/posttest study was conducted among 80 adolescents (aged 18–19) enrolled in a college at Kolhapur, India. The sample size was calculated based on the expected medium effect size ( d = 0.5), α = 0.05, power = 0.80. Participants were selected using simple random sampling (lottery method) from eligible students meeting the inclusion criteria. A 2-day interactive workshop based on social constructivist principles was implemented. Activities included group discussions, peer-led presentations, role-plays, and games. Validated and pilot-tested instruments assessed knowledge (30-item questionnaire, α = 0.82), attitudes (15-item Likert scale, α = 0.79), and intended practices (10-item checklist, α = 0.76) at baseline and 4 weeks postintervention. Paired t -tests, effect sizes, and Chi-square analyses were used to assess outcomes and demographic influences. Results: Mean knowledge scores increased significantly from 9.58 ± 2.30 to 15.23 ± 3.41 ( P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52–2.26). Positive attitudes rose from 21.3% to 78.8% postintervention ( P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.02–1.66). Preventive practice intentions improved from 3.62 ± 1.38 to 6.85 ± 1.92 ( P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.60–2.36). Moderate correlations were observed between knowledge and attitude changes ( r = 0.35, P = 0.002) and knowledge and practice changes ( r = 0.41, P < 0.001). All demographic subgroups benefited significantly, though improvements varied by baseline characteristics. Conclusions: The collaborative learning model significantly improved adolescent understanding and attitudes toward STDs, with implications for preventive behavior. While this preliminary study shows promise, randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to establish causal relationships and measure sustained behavioral outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_341_25
Primary Topic
Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Collaborative Learning on Adolescents’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Their Prevention

Karnellya Ohol, Janaki Shinde, Anupam Kamerikar, Rutuja Kumbhar
Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University
Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
article

Impact of Collaborative Learning on Adolescents’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Their Prevention

Karnellya Ohol, Janaki Shinde, Anupam Kamerikar, Rutuja Kumbhar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Adolescents, particularly those aged 15–24, account for nearly half of new sexually transmitted disease (STD) cases globally. Limited awareness and persistent misconceptions highlight the need for effective, adolescent-friendly education. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured collaborative learning intervention in enhancing STD-related knowledge, attitudes, and preventive intentions among college-going adolescents. Methods: A quasi-experimental, one-group pretest/posttest study was conducted among 80 adolescents (aged 18–19) enrolled in a college at Kolhapur, India. The sample size was calculated based on the expected medium effect size ( d = 0.5), α = 0.05, power = 0.80. Participants were selected using simple random sampling (lottery method) from eligible students meeting the inclusion criteria. A 2-day interactive workshop based on social constructivist principles was implemented. Activities included group discussions, peer-led presentations, role-plays, and games. Validated and pilot-tested instruments assessed knowledge (30-item questionnaire, α = 0.82), attitudes (15-item Likert scale, α = 0.79), and intended practices (10-item checklist, α = 0.76) at baseline and 4 weeks postintervention. Paired t -tests, effect sizes, and Chi-square analyses were used to assess outcomes and demographic influences. Results: Mean knowledge scores increased significantly from 9.58 ± 2.30 to 15.23 ± 3.41 ( P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52–2.26). Positive attitudes rose from 21.3% to 78.8% postintervention ( P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.02–1.66). Preventive practice intentions improved from 3.62 ± 1.38 to 6.85 ± 1.92 ( P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.60–2.36). Moderate correlations were observed between knowledge and attitude changes ( r = 0.35, P = 0.002) and knowledge and practice changes ( r = 0.41, P < 0.001). All demographic subgroups benefited significantly, though improvements varied by baseline characteristics. Conclusions: The collaborative learning model significantly improved adolescent understanding and attitudes toward STDs, with implications for preventive behavior. While this preliminary study shows promise, randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to establish causal relationships and measure sustained behavioral outcomes.

Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences UniversityVol. 20(4)
D.Y. Patil Education Society (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.