Environmental stressors and sleep health among low-income older adults: a mixed-methods study

Abstract Environmental factors are increasingly recognized as critical determinants of sleep health, particularly among older adults in low-income communities. This convergent mixed-methods study aimed to: (1) explore sleep environment stressors (SES) reported by community-dwelling, low-income older adults; and (2) compare subjective sleep health between those affected by SES and those who were not. Twenty-four older adults participated. SES were measured with Assessment of Sleep Environment (ASE), a 4-point Likert scale from “Strongly Agree” to “Strongly Disagree”. Participants were classified as Environmentally Impacted Sleepers (EIS, n = 14) if they endorsed any AES items, or as Environmentally Unimpacted Sleepers (EUS, n = 10) if they did not. Sleep health was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), with group comparisons analyzed using Welch’s t-tests and effect sizes (Cohen’s d with Hedges’ correction). Semi-structured interviews further explored perceived environmental stressors and sleep experiences, which were inductively coded and thematically analyzed. The most frequently self-reported stressors were: “too soft mattress” (n = 7), “uncomfortable smell” (n = 6), “too noisy” (n = 5), “too humid” (n = 5), “too cool” (n = 5), “too much light” (n = 5). Qualitative findings revealed that outdoor noise and thermal conditions as major stressors, and participants noted that adjusting their environment (e.g., lighting, sound, or fans) improved sleep; most participants described a cool, dimly lit room with some background noise as ideal. EIS group had worse sleep health (p<.001, d = 1.87). Both groups perceived poor sleep quality, frequent night awakenings, and medical aid use; yet EIS group more commonly described challenges returning to sleep. Addressing environmental stressors is essential for healthy aging sleep.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.4321
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental stressors and sleep health among low-income older adults: a mixed-methods study

Michelle Liu, Shuxian Hua, Claire Wang, Junxin Li et al.
Innovation in Aging
Sleep and related disorders
article

Environmental stressors and sleep health among low-income older adults: a mixed-methods study

Michelle Liu, Shuxian Hua, Claire Wang, Junxin Li, Sofia Liu, Russell Calderon, Hannah Fu, Youngmin Cho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Environmental factors are increasingly recognized as critical determinants of sleep health, particularly among older adults in low-income communities. This convergent mixed-methods study aimed to: (1) explore sleep environment stressors (SES) reported by community-dwelling, low-income older adults; and (2) compare subjective sleep health between those affected by SES and those who were not. Twenty-four older adults participated. SES were measured with Assessment of Sleep Environment (ASE), a 4-point Likert scale from “Strongly Agree” to “Strongly Disagree”. Participants were classified as Environmentally Impacted Sleepers (EIS, n = 14) if they endorsed any AES items, or as Environmentally Unimpacted Sleepers (EUS, n = 10) if they did not. Sleep health was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), with group comparisons analyzed using Welch’s t-tests and effect sizes (Cohen’s d with Hedges’ correction). Semi-structured interviews further explored perceived environmental stressors and sleep experiences, which were inductively coded and thematically analyzed. The most frequently self-reported stressors were: “too soft mattress” (n = 7), “uncomfortable smell” (n = 6), “too noisy” (n = 5), “too humid” (n = 5), “too cool” (n = 5), “too much light” (n = 5). Qualitative findings revealed that outdoor noise and thermal conditions as major stressors, and participants noted that adjusting their environment (e.g., lighting, sound, or fans) improved sleep; most participants described a cool, dimly lit room with some background noise as ideal. EIS group had worse sleep health (p<.001, d = 1.87). Both groups perceived poor sleep quality, frequent night awakenings, and medical aid use; yet EIS group more commonly described challenges returning to sleep. Addressing environmental stressors is essential for healthy aging sleep.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.