Does repeating a grade affect later life executive functioning? Findings from the Health and Retirement Study

Abstract Two-thirds of American adults report experiencing at least one Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE).1 ACEs demonstrate negative effects on executive functioning (EF), and EF difficulties in young children are associated with continued academic difficulties.2 In past decades, this meant repeating a grade. Studies suggest ACEs may affect adult cognition3, yet the mechanisms of this association remain underexplained. One mechanism may be that repeating a grade as a result or cause of early life stress, potentially affects later life EF. We investigated whether older adults who repeated a year of school performed poorly on Trails B, an EF task of rule switching and working memory. We examined 2,657 community-dwelling older adults from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) with data from the 2016 Life History Survey and the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol. All respondents had education and Trails B data. Study outcomes were Trails B scores, and the primary independent variable was repeating a year of school, controlling for age, degree, and race/ethnicity. Repeating a year of school was associated with lower Trails B scores (β = -.064, p <.001). Linear regression models found that final degree and repeating a year of school accounted for 13% of the variance in Trails B scores (R2 =.13, F(1, 2649)=11.94, p <.001). Together, age, race/ethnicity, final degree, and repeating a year of school explained 25% of the variance in Trails B scores (R2 =.25, F(2, 2644)=75.94, p <.001). Future research could examine possible mechanisms (e.g., decreased opportunity) by which education may impact later life EF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2455
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does repeating a grade affect later life executive functioning? Findings from the Health and Retirement Study

Rachel Missell-Gray, Silvia SoRensen, Ya-Han Chang
Innovation in Aging
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

Does repeating a grade affect later life executive functioning? Findings from the Health and Retirement Study

Rachel Missell-Gray, Silvia SoRensen, Ya-Han Chang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Two-thirds of American adults report experiencing at least one Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE).1 ACEs demonstrate negative effects on executive functioning (EF), and EF difficulties in young children are associated with continued academic difficulties.2 In past decades, this meant repeating a grade. Studies suggest ACEs may affect adult cognition3, yet the mechanisms of this association remain underexplained. One mechanism may be that repeating a grade as a result or cause of early life stress, potentially affects later life EF. We investigated whether older adults who repeated a year of school performed poorly on Trails B, an EF task of rule switching and working memory. We examined 2,657 community-dwelling older adults from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) with data from the 2016 Life History Survey and the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol. All respondents had education and Trails B data. Study outcomes were Trails B scores, and the primary independent variable was repeating a year of school, controlling for age, degree, and race/ethnicity. Repeating a year of school was associated with lower Trails B scores (β = -.064, p <.001). Linear regression models found that final degree and repeating a year of school accounted for 13% of the variance in Trails B scores (R2 =.13, F(1, 2649)=11.94, p <.001). Together, age, race/ethnicity, final degree, and repeating a year of school explained 25% of the variance in Trails B scores (R2 =.25, F(2, 2644)=75.94, p <.001). Future research could examine possible mechanisms (e.g., decreased opportunity) by which education may impact later life EF.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does repeating a grade affect later life executive functioning? Findings from the Health and Retirement Study — Rachel Missell-Gray, Silvia SoRensen, et al. · Innovation in Aging (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS