Cumulative Midlife Neighborhood Disadvantage and Late-Life Cognitive Change: The Mediating Role of Hemoglobin A1C

Abstract Neighborhood factors are recognized determinants of late-life cognitive function; mechanisms remain unclear but may include metabolic factors. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, we examined whether hemoglobin A1C, a 3-month measure of blood glucose level, partially explains the association between cumulative midlife neighborhood disadvantage and late-life cognitive change in 4,707 older adults aged 50+. Cumulative midlife neighborhood disadvantage (continuous score) captured average exposure to tract-level disadvantage, including poverty, unemployment, % female-headed households, and % households with public assistance. A1C level was categorized as < 5.7%, 5.7%-6.5%, and > =6.5%. Cognitive function was repeatedly assessed using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. Cognitive change groups (maintainers, minor decliners, major decliners) were identified based on participant-specific random slopes from a linear mixed model. Path analyses estimated coefficients and product method calculated the mediation effect. Higher neighborhood disadvantage was associated with elevated A1C (5.7%-6.5%, RRR—relative risk ratio: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4; > =6.5%, RRR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2, 1.6), and was associated with minor (RRR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.55) or major cognitive decline (RRR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.03). After controlling for A1c, neighborhood disadvantage remained associated with cognitive change, suggesting a partial mediating effect from blood glucose. Controlling the A1C level from > =6.5% to < 5.7% would potentially reduce the adverse effect of neighborhood disadvantage by 12% for minor and 16% for major cognitive decline. Midlife is a critical period of neighborhood exposure for cognitive health; targeting blood glucose could partially mitigate the adverse effect of neighborhood disadvantage on late-life cognitive decline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.745
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cumulative Midlife Neighborhood Disadvantage and Late-Life Cognitive Change: The Mediating Role of Hemoglobin A1C

Jeanine M. Buchanich, Christina Mair, Greta Jianjia Cheng, Andrea Rosso et al.
Innovation in Aging
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Cumulative Midlife Neighborhood Disadvantage and Late-Life Cognitive Change: The Mediating Role of Hemoglobin A1C

Jeanine M. Buchanich, Christina Mair, Greta Jianjia Cheng, Andrea Rosso, C Shaaban, Tiffany Gary-Webb
article en

Abstract

Abstract Neighborhood factors are recognized determinants of late-life cognitive function; mechanisms remain unclear but may include metabolic factors. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, we examined whether hemoglobin A1C, a 3-month measure of blood glucose level, partially explains the association between cumulative midlife neighborhood disadvantage and late-life cognitive change in 4,707 older adults aged 50+. Cumulative midlife neighborhood disadvantage (continuous score) captured average exposure to tract-level disadvantage, including poverty, unemployment, % female-headed households, and % households with public assistance. A1C level was categorized as < 5.7%, 5.7%-6.5%, and > =6.5%. Cognitive function was repeatedly assessed using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. Cognitive change groups (maintainers, minor decliners, major decliners) were identified based on participant-specific random slopes from a linear mixed model. Path analyses estimated coefficients and product method calculated the mediation effect. Higher neighborhood disadvantage was associated with elevated A1C (5.7%-6.5%, RRR—relative risk ratio: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4; > =6.5%, RRR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2, 1.6), and was associated with minor (RRR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.55) or major cognitive decline (RRR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.03). After controlling for A1c, neighborhood disadvantage remained associated with cognitive change, suggesting a partial mediating effect from blood glucose. Controlling the A1C level from > =6.5% to < 5.7% would potentially reduce the adverse effect of neighborhood disadvantage by 12% for minor and 16% for major cognitive decline. Midlife is a critical period of neighborhood exposure for cognitive health; targeting blood glucose could partially mitigate the adverse effect of neighborhood disadvantage on late-life cognitive decline.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.