Social Network Size in the Years Before Death: An Examination by Dementia Status

Abstract There is growing recognition that in addition to between-person differences in the size of older adults’ social networks, within-person network growth or shrinkage also influence well-being. Relatively little attention has been paid to patterns of social network change at the end of life, when health declines can render social networks especially important for quality of life, while also potentially compromising individuals’ ability to maintain social ties. Using longitudinal data from respondents of the National Health and Aging Trends Study who have died, we examine how core discussion network size changes in the years before death, with particular attention to differences in cognitive status at the end of life. Tests of mean differences indicated that respondents with normal cognition in the last interview before death had significantly larger core discussion networks (M = 2.10) compared to those with probable dementia (M = 1.79; p< .001). Among respondents with normal cognition in the last interview (N = 1,642), growth curve models revealed a linear decline of 0.03 social network members per year in the years before death (p<.001). Among respondents with probable dementia in their last interview (N = 1,002), network size did not change significantly in the years before death. Our results suggest that effective efforts to support older adults’ social engagement may depend on both timing and cognitive health status. Social interventions may provide more benefits for those with dementia if implemented before the end-of-life period, while efforts implemented at the end of life may still benefit older adults with normal cognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1165
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Network Size in the Years Before Death: An Examination by Dementia Status

Alyssa W. Goldman, Sara M. Moorman
Innovation in Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Social Network Size in the Years Before Death: An Examination by Dementia Status

Alyssa W. Goldman, Sara M. Moorman
article en

Abstract

Abstract There is growing recognition that in addition to between-person differences in the size of older adults’ social networks, within-person network growth or shrinkage also influence well-being. Relatively little attention has been paid to patterns of social network change at the end of life, when health declines can render social networks especially important for quality of life, while also potentially compromising individuals’ ability to maintain social ties. Using longitudinal data from respondents of the National Health and Aging Trends Study who have died, we examine how core discussion network size changes in the years before death, with particular attention to differences in cognitive status at the end of life. Tests of mean differences indicated that respondents with normal cognition in the last interview before death had significantly larger core discussion networks (M = 2.10) compared to those with probable dementia (M = 1.79; p< .001). Among respondents with normal cognition in the last interview (N = 1,642), growth curve models revealed a linear decline of 0.03 social network members per year in the years before death (p<.001). Among respondents with probable dementia in their last interview (N = 1,002), network size did not change significantly in the years before death. Our results suggest that effective efforts to support older adults’ social engagement may depend on both timing and cognitive health status. Social interventions may provide more benefits for those with dementia if implemented before the end-of-life period, while efforts implemented at the end of life may still benefit older adults with normal cognition.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Boston College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.