Rethinking social disconnection: does it always have a negative impact?

Abstract Social disconnection, which includes social isolation and loneliness, can negatively impact health and well-being in older adults. However, in reality, these relationships among social isolation, loneliness and well-being are complex. For example, isolated older adults might still feel lonely, but are satisfied with their situation, while those with numerous social connections may still experience loneliness. This study aimed to examine distinct subtypes of social disconnection based on the combination of loneliness and social isolation, and assess their impact on well-being. We analyzed data for all community-dwelling adults (n = 2,542) who participated in both the 2021 and 2022 samples of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. We found that 65% of older adults were neither isolated nor lonely (connected), 14% were only isolated, 15% were lonely but not isolated (lonely in a crowd), and 6% were both isolated and lonely. After controlling for demographic and socio-economic status, regression models show that, compared to the connected group, those who were disconnected or lonely in a crowd were likely to have more depression symptoms and negative emotions in the following wave. However, those who were only isolated did not show a significant difference in depression compared to the connected group. Compared to the connected group, all three other groups were more likely to report fewer positive emotions and more negative attitudes toward life. The findings suggest that feeling lonely is detrimental to well-being while social isolation alone may not be so. It highlights the need for community-based efforts to reduce loneliness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3118
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking social disconnection: does it always have a negative impact?

Robert Gramling, Maija Reblin, Hyojin Choi
Innovation in Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Rethinking social disconnection: does it always have a negative impact?

Robert Gramling, Maija Reblin, Hyojin Choi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Social disconnection, which includes social isolation and loneliness, can negatively impact health and well-being in older adults. However, in reality, these relationships among social isolation, loneliness and well-being are complex. For example, isolated older adults might still feel lonely, but are satisfied with their situation, while those with numerous social connections may still experience loneliness. This study aimed to examine distinct subtypes of social disconnection based on the combination of loneliness and social isolation, and assess their impact on well-being. We analyzed data for all community-dwelling adults (n = 2,542) who participated in both the 2021 and 2022 samples of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. We found that 65% of older adults were neither isolated nor lonely (connected), 14% were only isolated, 15% were lonely but not isolated (lonely in a crowd), and 6% were both isolated and lonely. After controlling for demographic and socio-economic status, regression models show that, compared to the connected group, those who were disconnected or lonely in a crowd were likely to have more depression symptoms and negative emotions in the following wave. However, those who were only isolated did not show a significant difference in depression compared to the connected group. Compared to the connected group, all three other groups were more likely to report fewer positive emotions and more negative attitudes toward life. The findings suggest that feeling lonely is detrimental to well-being while social isolation alone may not be so. It highlights the need for community-based efforts to reduce loneliness.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Vermont (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.