Comparison of enteric methane emissions between the respiration chamber and the carbon dioxide method in Holstein heifer

The CO 2 method (CO 2 T) for measuring enteric CH 4 emissions was validated using emissions data derived from respiration chambers (RC). The study was conducted over a period of 108 d using ten Holstein heifers with a mean initial body weight (BW) of 178 ± 24 kg and average age of 7 ± 0.7 months. There were three consecutive experimental periods, each consisting of 21 d of premeasurement feeding, followed by two 3-d periods of CH 4 measurement sessions with the CO 2 T and the RC, respectively, for each animal. The diet consisted of 55% timothy hay and 45% concentrate, and was supplied twice daily at 1.2% to 1.5% BW on an as-fed basis. The CO 2 T measurements were conducted at morning and afternoon feeding. There were no significant differences in dry matter intake (DMI; P = 0.155), CH 4 production (L/d and L/kg BW 0.75 ; P = 0.492 and 0.625, respectively), and CH 4 yield (L/kg DMI; P = 0.275) between the two methods. Results obtained using the RC and the CO 2 T were strongly correlated for both CH 4 production (L/d; r = 0.67, P = 0.042) and CH 4 yield (L/kg DMI; r = 0.61, P = 0.062). Linear regression analysis revealed moderate positive relationships between the two methods for CH 4 production ( R 2 = 0.52; P = 0.019) and CH 4 yield ( R 2 = 0.43; P = 0.039). In conclusion, the CO 2 T and the RC produce comparable results, with acceptable accuracy and precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal nutrition
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2025.09.014
Primary Topic
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of enteric methane emissions between the respiration chamber and the carbon dioxide method in Holstein heifer

Kamburawala Kankanamge Tharindu Namal Ranaweera, Md Najmul Haque, Sang Yeob Kim, Rajaraman Bharanidharan et al.
Animal nutrition
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
article

Comparison of enteric methane emissions between the respiration chamber and the carbon dioxide method in Holstein heifer

Kamburawala Kankanamge Tharindu Namal Ranaweera, Md Najmul Haque, Sang Yeob Kim, Rajaraman Bharanidharan, Seyun Im, Junsung Kyung, Kyoung Hoon Kim, Jaesung Lee, Myunggi Baik, Junseok Oh, Jinwoo Jeong
article en

Abstract

The CO 2 method (CO 2 T) for measuring enteric CH 4 emissions was validated using emissions data derived from respiration chambers (RC). The study was conducted over a period of 108 d using ten Holstein heifers with a mean initial body weight (BW) of 178 ± 24 kg and average age of 7 ± 0.7 months. There were three consecutive experimental periods, each consisting of 21 d of premeasurement feeding, followed by two 3-d periods of CH 4 measurement sessions with the CO 2 T and the RC, respectively, for each animal. The diet consisted of 55% timothy hay and 45% concentrate, and was supplied twice daily at 1.2% to 1.5% BW on an as-fed basis. The CO 2 T measurements were conducted at morning and afternoon feeding. There were no significant differences in dry matter intake (DMI; P = 0.155), CH 4 production (L/d and L/kg BW 0.75 ; P = 0.492 and 0.625, respectively), and CH 4 yield (L/kg DMI; P = 0.275) between the two methods. Results obtained using the RC and the CO 2 T were strongly correlated for both CH 4 production (L/d; r = 0.67, P = 0.042) and CH 4 yield (L/kg DMI; r = 0.61, P = 0.062). Linear regression analysis revealed moderate positive relationships between the two methods for CH 4 production ( R 2 = 0.52; P = 0.019) and CH 4 yield ( R 2 = 0.43; P = 0.039). In conclusion, the CO 2 T and the RC produce comparable results, with acceptable accuracy and precision.

Animal nutritionVol. 25
Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR), Seoul National University (KR), National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.