Trauma-Informed Praxis as a Building Block of Justice-Centered Science

Context: Justice-centered science education has come about as a means to challenge the often ahistorical and acultural nature of traditional science teaching and learning to address the social, political, and scientific ways science can be used to (re)produce, but also address, (in)justice. Despite these efforts, the complex emotional, physical, and moral dimensions of engaging in justice-centered practices are under-conceptualized, especially for youth living in areas historically and contemporarily affected by social, political, and environmental change. More specifically, there remains one injustice that has gone largely unexplored in the science education literature: trauma. Purpose of Study: When we consider the historic and contemporary racist paradigms of the scientific discipline and how that has bled into science teaching and learning, coupled with rates of multiple, intersecting forms of trauma—including those that are the result of science and schooling—the need for trauma-informed science learning becomes abundantly evident. In this conceptual article, we present a framework for trauma-informed science (TIS) as a critical pedagogical approach that builds upon and extends trauma-informed and justice-centered science literature to situate trauma, healing and well-being as an integral part of justice. We argue that this framework can support educators in constructing science learning experiences that center the healing and well-being of their students as a practice of justice. Research Design: We use the cell, the most basic unit of life, and its organelles, each of which performs a specialized function, as metaphors to conceptualize TIS as a foundational building block of justice-centered science. Just as a cell could not survive without all its organelles working together, the principles of TIS work in conjunction to help teachers reimagine the political and pedagogical ways in which they approach justice-centered science teaching. TIS is made up of six principles: (1) engage in justice-centered science practice; (2) focus on the role of race, racism, and other systems of domination; (3) center love as praxis and protection; (4) ground learning in safety, dignity, and belonging; (5) attune to emotionality and embodiment; and (6) situate healing as an active and ongoing process Conclusion: Because of the historical and contemporary ways that science, scientific enterprise, and science education have been used to perpetrate and justify trauma, coupled with rising rates of childhood trauma, there is a moral and pedagogical imperative that makes science education a ripe place to address trauma and center healing. We offer TIS not as a simple instructional shift or a pedagogical add-on, but as a fundamentally different pedagogical, epistemological, and political approach to the practice of justice-centered science teaching to support life-giving and life-affirming science learning experiences. Ultimately, we argue that we cannot say we are working toward justice-centered science education and classrooms if we remain unwilling to center the healing and well-being of students, families, and communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681251408915
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trauma-Informed Praxis as a Building Block of Justice-Centered Science

Symone Gyles, Sharim Hannegan-Martinez
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Trauma-Informed Praxis as a Building Block of Justice-Centered Science

Symone Gyles, Sharim Hannegan-Martinez
article en

Abstract

Context: Justice-centered science education has come about as a means to challenge the often ahistorical and acultural nature of traditional science teaching and learning to address the social, political, and scientific ways science can be used to (re)produce, but also address, (in)justice. Despite these efforts, the complex emotional, physical, and moral dimensions of engaging in justice-centered practices are under-conceptualized, especially for youth living in areas historically and contemporarily affected by social, political, and environmental change. More specifically, there remains one injustice that has gone largely unexplored in the science education literature: trauma. Purpose of Study: When we consider the historic and contemporary racist paradigms of the scientific discipline and how that has bled into science teaching and learning, coupled with rates of multiple, intersecting forms of trauma—including those that are the result of science and schooling—the need for trauma-informed science learning becomes abundantly evident. In this conceptual article, we present a framework for trauma-informed science (TIS) as a critical pedagogical approach that builds upon and extends trauma-informed and justice-centered science literature to situate trauma, healing and well-being as an integral part of justice. We argue that this framework can support educators in constructing science learning experiences that center the healing and well-being of their students as a practice of justice. Research Design: We use the cell, the most basic unit of life, and its organelles, each of which performs a specialized function, as metaphors to conceptualize TIS as a foundational building block of justice-centered science. Just as a cell could not survive without all its organelles working together, the principles of TIS work in conjunction to help teachers reimagine the political and pedagogical ways in which they approach justice-centered science teaching. TIS is made up of six principles: (1) engage in justice-centered science practice; (2) focus on the role of race, racism, and other systems of domination; (3) center love as praxis and protection; (4) ground learning in safety, dignity, and belonging; (5) attune to emotionality and embodiment; and (6) situate healing as an active and ongoing process Conclusion: Because of the historical and contemporary ways that science, scientific enterprise, and science education have been used to perpetrate and justify trauma, coupled with rising rates of childhood trauma, there is a moral and pedagogical imperative that makes science education a ripe place to address trauma and center healing. We offer TIS not as a simple instructional shift or a pedagogical add-on, but as a fundamentally different pedagogical, epistemological, and political approach to the practice of justice-centered science teaching to support life-giving and life-affirming science learning experiences. Ultimately, we argue that we cannot say we are working toward justice-centered science education and classrooms if we remain unwilling to center the healing and well-being of students, families, and communities.

Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in EducationVol. 127(11-12)
University of California, Irvine (US), University of Michigan (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.