Two kinds of consciousnesses in the Laṅkāvatārasūtra: A reexamination of the Sanskrit manuscripts and commentaries

The Laṅkāvatārasūtra (LAS) refers to two kinds of consciousnesses: the khyātivijñāna (khyāti-v. 現識 xianshi) and the vastuprativikalpavijñāna (vastuprativikalpa-v. 分別事識 fenbieshishi). Their lack of a clear definition has resulted in various interpretations. For instance, commentaries by Jñānaśrībhadra and Jñānavajra, preserved in Tibetan language, interpret the former as five sensory consciousnesses and the latter as mental consciousness. However, recent studies have argued that this interpretation conflicts with the eight-consciousness theory precisely found in the same paragraph of the LAS. In addition, a problem was observed in the description of khyāti-v. in the current Sanskrit edition of the LAS, which has deprived modern scholars of an accurate understanding of the passage. Moreover, if one reads Jñānavajra’s detailed commentary on it, it becomes clear that his interpretation is not inconsistent with the eight-consciousness theory but is rather based on a synthesis of the mind-only theory, the eight-consciousness theory, and the statements in the other sections of the LAS itself. This paper reinvestigates the two kinds of consciousnesses in the LAS by reexamining the Sanskrit manuscripts and Tibetan commentaries, thus revealing one aspect of consciousness theory in the LAS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Indian Philosophy
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-025-09619-6
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two kinds of consciousnesses in the Laṅkāvatārasūtra: A reexamination of the Sanskrit manuscripts and commentaries

Toshio Horiuchi
Journal of Indian Philosophy
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Two kinds of consciousnesses in the Laṅkāvatārasūtra: A reexamination of the Sanskrit manuscripts and commentaries

Toshio Horiuchi
article en

Abstract

The Laṅkāvatārasūtra (LAS) refers to two kinds of consciousnesses: the khyātivijñāna (khyāti-v. 現識 xianshi) and the vastuprativikalpavijñāna (vastuprativikalpa-v. 分別事識 fenbieshishi). Their lack of a clear definition has resulted in various interpretations. For instance, commentaries by Jñānaśrībhadra and Jñānavajra, preserved in Tibetan language, interpret the former as five sensory consciousnesses and the latter as mental consciousness. However, recent studies have argued that this interpretation conflicts with the eight-consciousness theory precisely found in the same paragraph of the LAS. In addition, a problem was observed in the description of khyāti-v. in the current Sanskrit edition of the LAS, which has deprived modern scholars of an accurate understanding of the passage. Moreover, if one reads Jñānavajra’s detailed commentary on it, it becomes clear that his interpretation is not inconsistent with the eight-consciousness theory but is rather based on a synthesis of the mind-only theory, the eight-consciousness theory, and the statements in the other sections of the LAS itself. This paper reinvestigates the two kinds of consciousnesses in the LAS by reexamining the Sanskrit manuscripts and Tibetan commentaries, thus revealing one aspect of consciousness theory in the LAS.

Journal of Indian PhilosophyVol. 54(1)
Toyo University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.