Comparing Motivational Interviewing with Education for Later Life Planning: A Two-arm Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract The prevalent view of ageing as a period of decline often obscures opportunities for growth, agency, and continued contribution. Reframing ageing requires moving beyond simply providing knowledge and instead empower individuals to take proactive action in planning for a thriving later life. This study developed and evaluated a theory-informed intervention designed to reframe later-life planning as an empowering process across health, financial, social participation, family life, and long-term care domains through a randomised controlled trial. Community-dwelling adults (aged 50-75) in Hong Kong (63.0±3.9 years, 72.9% female, 74.6% retired) were randomised to a 4-session strength-based motivational interviewing (MI, n = 30) intervention resolving ambivalence, or a structured education intervention (n = 29) for knowledge/skill-building. Outcomes included attitudes, preparedness, stage of change and confidence in multidimensional later-life planning and psychosocial well-being, assessed at baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1), and 1- (T2) and 3-month (T3) follow-ups. Generalised estimating equations examined differential changes in outcomes over time and groups. Overall, MI demonstrated sustained improvements in planning stages (p < 0.001, d = 0.77) and preparedness (p = 0.049, d = 0.33) at T3, outperforming Education. Such effects were particularly significant among social participation (planning stage: p = 0.02, d = 0.52) and health (preparedness: p = 0.03, d = 0.41) planning. Financial, family life, or long-term care planning, often requiring household-level consensus, were less responsive, warranting future family-based interventions. Both groups improved psychosocial outcomes (e.g., attitudes toward ageing, life satisfaction, self-efficacy; p < 0.05). This strengths-based model effectively empowers adults to engage with their later-life. By reframing planning from a burden to an opportunity for self-determination, it provides a tool for practitioners to advance equitable ageing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.4296
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Motivational Interviewing with Education for Later Life Planning: A Two-arm Randomised Controlled Trial

Youjuan Zhang, Xue Bai
Innovation in Aging
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Comparing Motivational Interviewing with Education for Later Life Planning: A Two-arm Randomised Controlled Trial

Youjuan Zhang, Xue Bai
article en

Abstract

Abstract The prevalent view of ageing as a period of decline often obscures opportunities for growth, agency, and continued contribution. Reframing ageing requires moving beyond simply providing knowledge and instead empower individuals to take proactive action in planning for a thriving later life. This study developed and evaluated a theory-informed intervention designed to reframe later-life planning as an empowering process across health, financial, social participation, family life, and long-term care domains through a randomised controlled trial. Community-dwelling adults (aged 50-75) in Hong Kong (63.0±3.9 years, 72.9% female, 74.6% retired) were randomised to a 4-session strength-based motivational interviewing (MI, n = 30) intervention resolving ambivalence, or a structured education intervention (n = 29) for knowledge/skill-building. Outcomes included attitudes, preparedness, stage of change and confidence in multidimensional later-life planning and psychosocial well-being, assessed at baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1), and 1- (T2) and 3-month (T3) follow-ups. Generalised estimating equations examined differential changes in outcomes over time and groups. Overall, MI demonstrated sustained improvements in planning stages (p < 0.001, d = 0.77) and preparedness (p = 0.049, d = 0.33) at T3, outperforming Education. Such effects were particularly significant among social participation (planning stage: p = 0.02, d = 0.52) and health (preparedness: p = 0.03, d = 0.41) planning. Financial, family life, or long-term care planning, often requiring household-level consensus, were less responsive, warranting future family-based interventions. Both groups improved psychosocial outcomes (e.g., attitudes toward ageing, life satisfaction, self-efficacy; p < 0.05). This strengths-based model effectively empowers adults to engage with their later-life. By reframing planning from a burden to an opportunity for self-determination, it provides a tool for practitioners to advance equitable ageing.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.