Cognitive Interventions for Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs

Abstract Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a common challenge among cancer survivors of both older and younger ages, adversely affecting attention, processing speed, memory, and executive function. These deficits often compromise daily activities and occupational performance. Given the limited efficacy of pharmacological treatments, non-pharmacological cognitive interventions have emerged as promising alternatives, although their effectiveness remains variable. This meta-analysis consolidates current evidence on the efficacy of cognitive interventions for enhancing cognitive function in individuals with CRCI. A systematic search of six databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated cognitive training interventions for CRCI. Studies were included if they assessed cognitive outcomes using standardized neuropsychological tests and/or self-reported measures. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane’s RoB 2.0, and effect sizes were calculated using Hedges’ g with a random-effects model in CMA 4.0. A total of 28 RCTs (n = 1,998) were included, with outcomes from both neuropsychological tests and self-reported measures. The interventions yielded significant improvements in several cognitive domains, including attention (k = 24, g = 0.24), processing speed (k = 19, g = 0.26), verbal memory (k = 22, g = 0.31), visuospatial memory (k = 9, g = 0.33), and executive function (k = 23, g = 0.20). Additionally, subjective cognitive function showed notable improvement (k = 25, g = 0.40). Subgroup analyses revealed that cognitive training (k = 19, g = 0.31) and meditation (k = 7, g = 0.32) produced significant effects, while exercise-based intervention did not yield significant benefits. This meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting beneficial effects of cognitive interventions for managing CRCI. Further research is needed to identify the optimal training modalities and to assess long-term benefits, which guide clinical practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2901
Primary Topic
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Interventions for Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs

Ahrim Lee, Kyeongin Cha, MiSook Jung, Moonkyoung Park et al.
Innovation in Aging
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
article

Cognitive Interventions for Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs

Ahrim Lee, Kyeongin Cha, MiSook Jung, Moonkyoung Park, Moira Kirvan Visovatti
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a common challenge among cancer survivors of both older and younger ages, adversely affecting attention, processing speed, memory, and executive function. These deficits often compromise daily activities and occupational performance. Given the limited efficacy of pharmacological treatments, non-pharmacological cognitive interventions have emerged as promising alternatives, although their effectiveness remains variable. This meta-analysis consolidates current evidence on the efficacy of cognitive interventions for enhancing cognitive function in individuals with CRCI. A systematic search of six databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated cognitive training interventions for CRCI. Studies were included if they assessed cognitive outcomes using standardized neuropsychological tests and/or self-reported measures. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane’s RoB 2.0, and effect sizes were calculated using Hedges’ g with a random-effects model in CMA 4.0. A total of 28 RCTs (n = 1,998) were included, with outcomes from both neuropsychological tests and self-reported measures. The interventions yielded significant improvements in several cognitive domains, including attention (k = 24, g = 0.24), processing speed (k = 19, g = 0.26), verbal memory (k = 22, g = 0.31), visuospatial memory (k = 9, g = 0.33), and executive function (k = 23, g = 0.20). Additionally, subjective cognitive function showed notable improvement (k = 25, g = 0.40). Subgroup analyses revealed that cognitive training (k = 19, g = 0.31) and meditation (k = 7, g = 0.32) produced significant effects, while exercise-based intervention did not yield significant benefits. This meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting beneficial effects of cognitive interventions for managing CRCI. Further research is needed to identify the optimal training modalities and to assess long-term benefits, which guide clinical practices.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Eastern Michigan University (US), Chungnam National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.