Age Inclusivity: Perceptions by Students, Faculty, and Staff of the Neglected DEI Category

Abstract Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in higher education seldom incorporate age-inclusive values, practices, and policies in intentional ways into ongoing programs. However, the need to advance age inclusivity across our colleges and universities has become a pressing issue for many reasons which call for extending attention to this neglected category. The results of a study are described in which a qualitative analysis was conducted of responses by 412 students, faculty, and staff to an open-ended question about age inclusivity. Although some responses indicated that age inclusivity was an unfamiliar concept (12%), many other responses indicated that respondents perceived age inclusivity in higher education as a valuable focus (40%). Differing views included that age inclusivity should not be a focus in higher education for various reasons including that the needs of younger students are more central to the mission of higher education or that the efforts should be “age-blind” just as other DEI efforts should be “color-blind” (26%), or that it can only work if it is enacted appropriately and thoughtfully (12%). Other comments revealed the existence of ageism on campuses, and the need to rethink how higher education refers to age-diverse students and uses language to communicate information about aging to avoid reinforcing ageist thinking. Study results offer several insights about integrating a more age-inclusive focus into broader DEI efforts including the need to raise awareness, make a clear case for the benefits, and utilize meaningful strategies with specific goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.690
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age Inclusivity: Perceptions by Students, Faculty, and Staff of the Neglected DEI Category

Nina M. Silverstein, Joann M. Montepare, Lauren Marshall Bowen, Susan Whitbourne
Innovation in Aging
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Age Inclusivity: Perceptions by Students, Faculty, and Staff of the Neglected DEI Category

Nina M. Silverstein, Joann M. Montepare, Lauren Marshall Bowen, Susan Whitbourne
article en

Abstract

Abstract Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in higher education seldom incorporate age-inclusive values, practices, and policies in intentional ways into ongoing programs. However, the need to advance age inclusivity across our colleges and universities has become a pressing issue for many reasons which call for extending attention to this neglected category. The results of a study are described in which a qualitative analysis was conducted of responses by 412 students, faculty, and staff to an open-ended question about age inclusivity. Although some responses indicated that age inclusivity was an unfamiliar concept (12%), many other responses indicated that respondents perceived age inclusivity in higher education as a valuable focus (40%). Differing views included that age inclusivity should not be a focus in higher education for various reasons including that the needs of younger students are more central to the mission of higher education or that the efforts should be “age-blind” just as other DEI efforts should be “color-blind” (26%), or that it can only work if it is enacted appropriately and thoughtfully (12%). Other comments revealed the existence of ageism on campuses, and the need to rethink how higher education refers to age-diverse students and uses language to communicate information about aging to avoid reinforcing ageist thinking. Study results offer several insights about integrating a more age-inclusive focus into broader DEI efforts including the need to raise awareness, make a clear case for the benefits, and utilize meaningful strategies with specific goals.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Lasell College (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Age Inclusivity: Perceptions by Students, Faculty, and Staff of the Neglected DEI Category — Nina M. Silverstein, Joann M. Montepare, et al. · Innovation in Aging (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS