Inconsistent definitions of transplant ineligibility in multiple myeloma: A systematic review

High-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). A substantial proportion of patients are deemed ineligible for ASCT due to age, comorbidities, performance status and/or frailty. Criteria defining transplant ineligibility remain inconsistent and poorly characterized. We conducted a systematic review that assessed phase II, III and IV randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through March 2025. We included a total of 55 studies that enrolled transplant-ineligible/deferred NDMM patients. Among 55 transplant-ineligible trials, only 47% explicitly defined ineligibility criteria. Of these, 44% of trials used age as a cut-off with/without other criteria. Only two studies explicitly specified which comorbidities constituted transplant ineligibility. When age was utilized as a cut-off, age ≥65 was the most commonly used cut-off. The median age of participants in these trials ranged from 62 years to 78.5 years and showed a trend upwards over time (p = 0.1388). Performance status of enrolled patients was reported inconsistently. Frailty tools were reported in 22% of studies. RCTs enrolling transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM demonstrated considerable heterogeneity in defining ineligibility. While the decision to pursue ASCT remains individualized, the absence of evidence-based definitions of transplant ineligibility complicates research interpretation and clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Haematology
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70323
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inconsistent definitions of transplant ineligibility in multiple myeloma: A systematic review

Luciano J. Costa, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Muzaffar H. Qazilbash, Kenneth H. Shain et al.
British Journal of Haematology
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Inconsistent definitions of transplant ineligibility in multiple myeloma: A systematic review

Luciano J. Costa, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Muzaffar H. Qazilbash, Kenneth H. Shain, Maria Mainou, Samer S.A. Al Hadidi, Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi, Karun Neupane, Darshi Shah, Aaron M. Goodman, Mitch Singstock, Riyasha Dahal, Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin, Febe Smith, Hira Mian, Ariel Grajales‐Cruz
article en

Abstract

High-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). A substantial proportion of patients are deemed ineligible for ASCT due to age, comorbidities, performance status and/or frailty. Criteria defining transplant ineligibility remain inconsistent and poorly characterized. We conducted a systematic review that assessed phase II, III and IV randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through March 2025. We included a total of 55 studies that enrolled transplant-ineligible/deferred NDMM patients. Among 55 transplant-ineligible trials, only 47% explicitly defined ineligibility criteria. Of these, 44% of trials used age as a cut-off with/without other criteria. Only two studies explicitly specified which comorbidities constituted transplant ineligibility. When age was utilized as a cut-off, age ≥65 was the most commonly used cut-off. The median age of participants in these trials ranged from 62 years to 78.5 years and showed a trend upwards over time (p = 0.1388). Performance status of enrolled patients was reported inconsistently. Frailty tools were reported in 22% of studies. RCTs enrolling transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM demonstrated considerable heterogeneity in defining ineligibility. While the decision to pursue ASCT remains individualized, the absence of evidence-based definitions of transplant ineligibility complicates research interpretation and clinical decision-making.

British Journal of HaematologyVol. 208(3)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), University of Utah (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Stony Brook School (US), State College of Florida Manatee-Sarasota (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Stony Brook University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), McMaster University (CA)
Conquer Cancer Foundation, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Genentech
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.