Development and psychometric evaluation of future physicians' approach to health literacy scale (F-PATHS)

Objective: Health literacy (HL) practices are a key element of effective communication between patients and healthcare professionals, enabling the delivery of better quality patient-centered care. The main purpose of this study is to develop a set of scales within the scope of an Erasmus + European Union Project in order to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of clinical period students of the national partners about HL. Subsequently, the validity and reliability analyses of the set of scales (Future Physicians’ Approach to HL Scale, F-PATHS) are presented. Methods: A total of 39 statements, to be analyzed for validity and reliability, were delivered to the participants by the convenience sampling method as a component of an online data collection form with a total of 62 questions prepared through Google Forms. Then, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was applied to evaluate the construct validity. Principal component analysis and the “direct oblimin” rotation method were used in EFA. The reliability was calculated with Cronbach’s Alpha and the item-total score correlation. Results: Considering the factor loadings and theoretical framework, items 3, 4 and 26 were removed from the scale set. The total variance explained percentage of the final scale set was 63.96% and the number of factors was 7. The KMO value was 0.913, and the Bartlett test was statistically significant (p<0.001). Considering the theoretical structure and Likert format of the scale set, it was determined that it measured different characteristics and could be evaluated independently as three separate scales. According to the KMO value and Bartlett’s test, the data were suitable for factor analysis for all three scales and the factor structure was regular. Cronbach's Alpha values of the scales are 0.862, 0.858, and 0.909, respectively. Conclusion: F-PATHS appears to be valid in terms of EFA and reliable for determining the approaches of faculty of medicine clinical term students regarding the HL of the society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Dergisi
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20518/tjph.1623065
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and psychometric evaluation of future physicians' approach to health literacy scale (F-PATHS)

Tülin Çoban, Sevgi Turan, fahriye has akdağ, Şirin Hülya et al.
Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Dergisi
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Development and psychometric evaluation of future physicians' approach to health literacy scale (F-PATHS)

Tülin Çoban, Sevgi Turan, fahriye has akdağ, Şirin Hülya, Sarp Üner, Bürge Atılgan, Damla Özyürek, Seçil Özkan, L. Hilal Özcebe
article en

Abstract

Objective: Health literacy (HL) practices are a key element of effective communication between patients and healthcare professionals, enabling the delivery of better quality patient-centered care. The main purpose of this study is to develop a set of scales within the scope of an Erasmus + European Union Project in order to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of clinical period students of the national partners about HL. Subsequently, the validity and reliability analyses of the set of scales (Future Physicians’ Approach to HL Scale, F-PATHS) are presented. Methods: A total of 39 statements, to be analyzed for validity and reliability, were delivered to the participants by the convenience sampling method as a component of an online data collection form with a total of 62 questions prepared through Google Forms. Then, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was applied to evaluate the construct validity. Principal component analysis and the “direct oblimin” rotation method were used in EFA. The reliability was calculated with Cronbach’s Alpha and the item-total score correlation. Results: Considering the factor loadings and theoretical framework, items 3, 4 and 26 were removed from the scale set. The total variance explained percentage of the final scale set was 63.96% and the number of factors was 7. The KMO value was 0.913, and the Bartlett test was statistically significant (p<0.001). Considering the theoretical structure and Likert format of the scale set, it was determined that it measured different characteristics and could be evaluated independently as three separate scales. According to the KMO value and Bartlett’s test, the data were suitable for factor analysis for all three scales and the factor structure was regular. Cronbach's Alpha values of the scales are 0.862, 0.858, and 0.909, respectively. Conclusion: F-PATHS appears to be valid in terms of EFA and reliable for determining the approaches of faculty of medicine clinical term students regarding the HL of the society.

Türkiye Halk Sağlığı DergisiVol. 23(3)
Ministry of Health (TR), ADA University (AZ), Directorate of Health (IS), Gazi Hastanesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Ministry of Health (TT), Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.