Risk Factors of Loneliness in Community-dwelling socially isolated older adults

Abstract This study aims to identify the risk factors leading to loneliness in community-dwelling socially isolated older adults. The Lubben Social Network Scale-6 determined social isolation, whereas the UCLA 3-item loneliness scale assessed loneliness. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from September 2023 to February 2025, the age group and gender weightings were applied to ensure the population representative. Of the 596 older adults approached in the Hong Kong SAR, China, 269 (45.1%) were considered socially isolated, of which 62 (23.0%) socially isolated older adults experienced loneliness. Results of the logistic regression indicated that socially isolated older adults who attained primary education or below and had chronic disease had the odds ratio of 2.57 (95% CI: 1.31, 5.02) and 3.44 (95% CI: 1.15, 10.33) in undergoing loneliness comparing to those with secondary education or above, and healthy older adults respectively. Socially isolated older adults who reported deaf or severe hearing loss also revealed amplified loneliness risk with an odds ratio of 3.51 (95% CI: 1.04-11.90). Socially isolated older adults with poor quality of life of EQ-5D-5L utility ≤0.801 had enhanced loneliness risk with an odds ratio of 8.75 (95% CI: 3.05, 25.08) in contrast to those with EQ-5D-5L utility =1. Recognizing the leading factors to loneliness in socially isolated older adults provides insights to develop effective community interventions to combat loneliness and social isolation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3119
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Factors of Loneliness in Community-dwelling socially isolated older adults

Clement Cheuk-Wai Ng, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Carol Ka-Po Wong et al.
Innovation in Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Risk Factors of Loneliness in Community-dwelling socially isolated older adults

Clement Cheuk-Wai Ng, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Carol Ka-Po Wong, Shirley Shuk-KuenLui
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to identify the risk factors leading to loneliness in community-dwelling socially isolated older adults. The Lubben Social Network Scale-6 determined social isolation, whereas the UCLA 3-item loneliness scale assessed loneliness. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from September 2023 to February 2025, the age group and gender weightings were applied to ensure the population representative. Of the 596 older adults approached in the Hong Kong SAR, China, 269 (45.1%) were considered socially isolated, of which 62 (23.0%) socially isolated older adults experienced loneliness. Results of the logistic regression indicated that socially isolated older adults who attained primary education or below and had chronic disease had the odds ratio of 2.57 (95% CI: 1.31, 5.02) and 3.44 (95% CI: 1.15, 10.33) in undergoing loneliness comparing to those with secondary education or above, and healthy older adults respectively. Socially isolated older adults who reported deaf or severe hearing loss also revealed amplified loneliness risk with an odds ratio of 3.51 (95% CI: 1.04-11.90). Socially isolated older adults with poor quality of life of EQ-5D-5L utility ≤0.801 had enhanced loneliness risk with an odds ratio of 8.75 (95% CI: 3.05, 25.08) in contrast to those with EQ-5D-5L utility =1. Recognizing the leading factors to loneliness in socially isolated older adults provides insights to develop effective community interventions to combat loneliness and social isolation.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.