DIGNITY: Feedback From Rural Nursing Home Stakeholders via Community Engagement Studios

Abstract Prior intervention development work identified the need to involve rural nursing home (NH) stakeholders in the initial development of DIGNITY. To meet this need, Community Engagement (CE) Studios were held to obtain feedback on study design and procedures (intervention protocol, program materials, implementation and evaluation plan). Four rounds of CE Studios were conducted with self-identified NH leaders, staff, regulators, and resident advocates (n = 2), and rural NH community staff, residents with dementia, and family members (n = 2). All CE studios were held in person and followed institutional guidelines. Each CE studio followed a similar format including: a welcome and ice breaker exercise, an introduction to the DIGNITY program, a risky preference card sort activity, and a detailed review of relevant DIGNITY program manual procedures and tools. Audio recordings and written field notes recorded participant responses. Rapid content analysis provided themes for reporting results in a standardized feedback loop. In total, 39 Community Experts participated in CE studios between July 2022 and August 2024. The Experts represented NH leadership (n = 3), nursing staff (n = 10), social work (n = 1), activities staff (n = 1), residents with dementia (n = 4), family members (n = 4), surveyors (n = 15), and a federal regulator (n = 1). Just under half of the participants were working/living in a rural NH community (n = 16). Experts primarily suggested changes to program materials and procedures, including the DIGNITY Practice Model, Personal Risk Portfolio, Risk and Impact Worksheet, and Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Tool. Experts were also concerned about program costs. Future work needs to implement all expert suggestions into the intervention manual.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2069
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIGNITY: Feedback From Rural Nursing Home Stakeholders via Community Engagement Studios

Liza L. Behrens, Marie P. Boltz, Jennifer L. Kraschnewski, K S Van Haitsma et al.
Innovation in Aging
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

DIGNITY: Feedback From Rural Nursing Home Stakeholders via Community Engagement Studios

Liza L. Behrens, Marie P. Boltz, Jennifer L. Kraschnewski, K S Van Haitsma, Susan Ryan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Prior intervention development work identified the need to involve rural nursing home (NH) stakeholders in the initial development of DIGNITY. To meet this need, Community Engagement (CE) Studios were held to obtain feedback on study design and procedures (intervention protocol, program materials, implementation and evaluation plan). Four rounds of CE Studios were conducted with self-identified NH leaders, staff, regulators, and resident advocates (n = 2), and rural NH community staff, residents with dementia, and family members (n = 2). All CE studios were held in person and followed institutional guidelines. Each CE studio followed a similar format including: a welcome and ice breaker exercise, an introduction to the DIGNITY program, a risky preference card sort activity, and a detailed review of relevant DIGNITY program manual procedures and tools. Audio recordings and written field notes recorded participant responses. Rapid content analysis provided themes for reporting results in a standardized feedback loop. In total, 39 Community Experts participated in CE studios between July 2022 and August 2024. The Experts represented NH leadership (n = 3), nursing staff (n = 10), social work (n = 1), activities staff (n = 1), residents with dementia (n = 4), family members (n = 4), surveyors (n = 15), and a federal regulator (n = 1). Just under half of the participants were working/living in a rural NH community (n = 16). Experts primarily suggested changes to program materials and procedures, including the DIGNITY Practice Model, Personal Risk Portfolio, Risk and Impact Worksheet, and Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Tool. Experts were also concerned about program costs. Future work needs to implement all expert suggestions into the intervention manual.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Pennsylvania State University (US), VA Capitol Health Care Network (US), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.