Understanding Differences in Treatment Burden Among Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions

Abstract Older adults managing multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) often need to balance various medications, treatments, and interventions, so this group of older adults is expected to experience healthcare burden. In this study, we examined the treatment burden of a group of 397 veterans who were older than 65 with three or more chronic conditions and/or ten or more medications. Of this group, 115/397 surprisingly reported no burden (NB) on the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (overall score = zero) while 282/397 reported an average score of 50 during baseline data collection. A chi-square test was run on different demographic variables to determine differences between participants reporting NB versus some burden (SB). NB and SB groups had older adults of similar race, gender, ethnicity, housing status, and educational level. However, older adults reporting NB more frequently reported perfect scores on the PROMIS questionnaire (NB: 48.7%; SB: 17.4%) and a 27/30 (90%) or better on the WBS questionnaire (NB: 52.2%; SB: 19.9%). Older adults reporting SB more frequently reported using assistive devices (NB: 20%; SB: 34.8%) and feeling as if every task was effortful (NB: 23.5%; SB: 40.8). These findings suggest that despite similar background and management of MCCs, older adults with minimal functional and mobility limitations often report NB. Furthermore, perceptions of treatment burden are related to perceptions of wellbeing and quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2279
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Differences in Treatment Burden Among Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions

Lilian Dindo, Lea Kiefer, Anne Wang, Marcia C. Mecca et al.
Innovation in Aging
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
article

Understanding Differences in Treatment Burden Among Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions

Lilian Dindo, Lea Kiefer, Anne Wang, Marcia C. Mecca, Terri R. Fried, Jie Liang, Aanand Naik
article en

Abstract

Abstract Older adults managing multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) often need to balance various medications, treatments, and interventions, so this group of older adults is expected to experience healthcare burden. In this study, we examined the treatment burden of a group of 397 veterans who were older than 65 with three or more chronic conditions and/or ten or more medications. Of this group, 115/397 surprisingly reported no burden (NB) on the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (overall score = zero) while 282/397 reported an average score of 50 during baseline data collection. A chi-square test was run on different demographic variables to determine differences between participants reporting NB versus some burden (SB). NB and SB groups had older adults of similar race, gender, ethnicity, housing status, and educational level. However, older adults reporting NB more frequently reported perfect scores on the PROMIS questionnaire (NB: 48.7%; SB: 17.4%) and a 27/30 (90%) or better on the WBS questionnaire (NB: 52.2%; SB: 19.9%). Older adults reporting SB more frequently reported using assistive devices (NB: 20%; SB: 34.8%) and feeling as if every task was effortful (NB: 23.5%; SB: 40.8). These findings suggest that despite similar background and management of MCCs, older adults with minimal functional and mobility limitations often report NB. Furthermore, perceptions of treatment burden are related to perceptions of wellbeing and quality of life.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), VA Connecticut Research and Education Foundation (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.