Prosociality, Cognition, & Health: Diversity and Consistency of Prosocial Behaviors Matters

Abstract Research demonstrates that being prosocial—engaging in behaviors that benefit others—relates to better cognition and health outcomes across the lifespan. However, the effect of engaging in multiple prosocial behaviors consistently over time has yet to be investigated. Using the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study, we examined the relationship between three prosocial behaviors (volunteering, informally helping others, donating money), cognition (episodic memory, executive function), and functional health at Wave 3 (2013/2014). Participants (N = 2,096, ages 42-92) reported how many hours/month they volunteered and informally helped others and dollars/month they donated to organizations. We created a categorical variable for each behavior wherein participants received 0 if they didn’t engage in those behaviors and 1 if they did. Replicating past work, we found those who engaged in each prosocial behavior had better cognition and functional health than those that did not, controlling for age, sex, education, race, and income. Critically, in a separate model, we found age moderated the effect of informal helping on executive function; informally helping others was more beneficial for older adults than younger adults. Furthermore, we found participants who engaged in more prosocial behaviors (2 or 3) had better cognition and health than those that engaged in fewer (0 or 1). Finally, we found those who consistently volunteered and donated over 10 years had better cognition than those who did so inconsistently. These results suggest that consistently participating in a variety of prosocial behaviors could be protective for middle and older adults’ cognition and health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2567
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prosociality, Cognition, & Health: Diversity and Consistency of Prosocial Behaviors Matters

Morgan Taylor, Margie Lachman
Innovation in Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Prosociality, Cognition, & Health: Diversity and Consistency of Prosocial Behaviors Matters

Morgan Taylor, Margie Lachman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Research demonstrates that being prosocial—engaging in behaviors that benefit others—relates to better cognition and health outcomes across the lifespan. However, the effect of engaging in multiple prosocial behaviors consistently over time has yet to be investigated. Using the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study, we examined the relationship between three prosocial behaviors (volunteering, informally helping others, donating money), cognition (episodic memory, executive function), and functional health at Wave 3 (2013/2014). Participants (N = 2,096, ages 42-92) reported how many hours/month they volunteered and informally helped others and dollars/month they donated to organizations. We created a categorical variable for each behavior wherein participants received 0 if they didn’t engage in those behaviors and 1 if they did. Replicating past work, we found those who engaged in each prosocial behavior had better cognition and functional health than those that did not, controlling for age, sex, education, race, and income. Critically, in a separate model, we found age moderated the effect of informal helping on executive function; informally helping others was more beneficial for older adults than younger adults. Furthermore, we found participants who engaged in more prosocial behaviors (2 or 3) had better cognition and health than those that engaged in fewer (0 or 1). Finally, we found those who consistently volunteered and donated over 10 years had better cognition than those who did so inconsistently. These results suggest that consistently participating in a variety of prosocial behaviors could be protective for middle and older adults’ cognition and health.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Brandeis University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.