Financial Protection vs Autonomy, Perspectives from Fraud Victims on A Financial Account Temporary Hold Policy

Abstract A temporary financial account hold policy, also known as an authorization hold, is a temporary restriction on transferring funds out of a bank or brokerage account. This policy may be utilized as a consumer protection tool to prevent older adult accountholders from elder financial exploitation. Our qualitative study interviewed 12 older fraud victims or their authorized proxies (mean age: 75; mean loss amount: $52,690 ranging from $3500 to $240,000) who experienced a temporary account hold to understand the benefits, costs, and the psychological impact. More than half of the participants showed appreciation and understood the intent of their financial institution(s) to keep them safe from fraud or abuse. However, some perceived the protective temporary hold as infringing on their right to financial self-determination and were upset. A minority of participants faced negative economic impacts, such as credit card companies closing victims’ accounts due to risk concerns, difficulty opening new accounts elsewhere, credit score drops, and inability to access their funds for daily activities. Psychosocial outcomes included feeling anxious, depressed, ashamed, and lonely. Participants recommended more transparency, communication, emotional support, and education. Using thematic analysis, this study will offer victims’ perspectives on the impact of the temporary account hold policy and facilitate a critical discussion on the importance of self-determination in the consumer protection field. Victims’ stories of financial exploitation and their attitudes toward perpetrators will also be discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3141
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial Protection vs Autonomy, Perspectives from Fraud Victims on A Financial Account Temporary Hold Policy

Marguerite DeLiema, S. Bindra, Louise (Siyu) Gao
Innovation in Aging
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

Financial Protection vs Autonomy, Perspectives from Fraud Victims on A Financial Account Temporary Hold Policy

Marguerite DeLiema, S. Bindra, Louise (Siyu) Gao
article en

Abstract

Abstract A temporary financial account hold policy, also known as an authorization hold, is a temporary restriction on transferring funds out of a bank or brokerage account. This policy may be utilized as a consumer protection tool to prevent older adult accountholders from elder financial exploitation. Our qualitative study interviewed 12 older fraud victims or their authorized proxies (mean age: 75; mean loss amount: $52,690 ranging from $3500 to $240,000) who experienced a temporary account hold to understand the benefits, costs, and the psychological impact. More than half of the participants showed appreciation and understood the intent of their financial institution(s) to keep them safe from fraud or abuse. However, some perceived the protective temporary hold as infringing on their right to financial self-determination and were upset. A minority of participants faced negative economic impacts, such as credit card companies closing victims’ accounts due to risk concerns, difficulty opening new accounts elsewhere, credit score drops, and inability to access their funds for daily activities. Psychosocial outcomes included feeling anxious, depressed, ashamed, and lonely. Participants recommended more transparency, communication, emotional support, and education. Using thematic analysis, this study will offer victims’ perspectives on the impact of the temporary account hold policy and facilitate a critical discussion on the importance of self-determination in the consumer protection field. Victims’ stories of financial exploitation and their attitudes toward perpetrators will also be discussed.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Financial Protection vs Autonomy, Perspectives from Fraud Victims on A Financial Account Temporary Hold Policy — Marguerite DeLiema, S. Bindra, et al. · Innovation in Aging (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS