Critical Issues in the Assessment of Loneliness in Older Latino Adults in the Dolores and Soledad Qualitative Study

Abstract Despite the large number of US older Latinos, there is a dearth of literature that examines loneliness in this population. We examine loneliness assessment issues from the Dolores and Soledad Study that included loneliness and/or chronic pain illness narrative interviews with 35 Spanish-speaking Latinos (60 years+) with multiple chronic conditions. Loneliness assessment included the question “Do you feel lonely?” and the 3-item UCLA Loneliness scale. Interviewers were bilingual (English/Spanish) gerontological social workers with training in culturally sensitive clinical research, and elicitation of “sensitive data.” Participants were predominantly Puerto Rican or immigrated from Dominican Republic, Ecuador, and Mexico. Most participants had lived in the US (New York or Los Angeles) for 30+ years, and overwhelmingly reported clinically significant depressive symptoms or chronic pain (86%). We identified multiple assessment challenges including participants’: 1) hesitation about discussing emotional well-being; 2) limited prior discussion of loneliness with family, friends or professionals (e.g., to prevent their emotional distress); 3) linguistic and conceptual difficulties in differentiating between loneliness, social isolation, and solitude that do not align with westernized perspectives (e.g., “soledad” may indicate loneliness and/or solitude and influenced by familism and immigrant experiences); 4) ambivalence about feelings of loneliness (e.g., felt they should not feel alone); 5) non-linear descriptions that included varying dimensions (e.g., emotional /existential, chronicity, causes); and 6) loneliness narratives that were linked to traumatic life events (e.g., physical/sexual violence). Findings support a need for culturally-informed loneliness assessments and narrative methods. These approaches may enhance trust and facilitate recognition and elicitation of loneliness narratives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.060
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Issues in the Assessment of Loneliness in Older Latino Adults in the Dolores and Soledad Qualitative Study

David Camacho, Kelly Pacheco, Elaine Wethington, M Carrington Reid et al.
Innovation in Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Critical Issues in the Assessment of Loneliness in Older Latino Adults in the Dolores and Soledad Qualitative Study

David Camacho, Kelly Pacheco, Elaine Wethington, M Carrington Reid, María Aranda
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite the large number of US older Latinos, there is a dearth of literature that examines loneliness in this population. We examine loneliness assessment issues from the Dolores and Soledad Study that included loneliness and/or chronic pain illness narrative interviews with 35 Spanish-speaking Latinos (60 years+) with multiple chronic conditions. Loneliness assessment included the question “Do you feel lonely?” and the 3-item UCLA Loneliness scale. Interviewers were bilingual (English/Spanish) gerontological social workers with training in culturally sensitive clinical research, and elicitation of “sensitive data.” Participants were predominantly Puerto Rican or immigrated from Dominican Republic, Ecuador, and Mexico. Most participants had lived in the US (New York or Los Angeles) for 30+ years, and overwhelmingly reported clinically significant depressive symptoms or chronic pain (86%). We identified multiple assessment challenges including participants’: 1) hesitation about discussing emotional well-being; 2) limited prior discussion of loneliness with family, friends or professionals (e.g., to prevent their emotional distress); 3) linguistic and conceptual difficulties in differentiating between loneliness, social isolation, and solitude that do not align with westernized perspectives (e.g., “soledad” may indicate loneliness and/or solitude and influenced by familism and immigrant experiences); 4) ambivalence about feelings of loneliness (e.g., felt they should not feel alone); 5) non-linear descriptions that included varying dimensions (e.g., emotional /existential, chronicity, causes); and 6) loneliness narratives that were linked to traumatic life events (e.g., physical/sexual violence). Findings support a need for culturally-informed loneliness assessments and narrative methods. These approaches may enhance trust and facilitate recognition and elicitation of loneliness narratives.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Southern California (US), Cornell University (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), New York University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.