Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Interpersonal Discrimination, and Cognitive Performance: An Intersectional Analysis

Abstract Previous research has shown that interpersonal discrimination affects cognitive health disparities across gender and race/ethnicity. However, the impact of belonging to multiple social groups on these experiences is rarely considered. We applied an intersectional perspective to examine how gender, race/ethnicity, and interpersonal discrimination intersect to socially pattern cognitive performance in a cohort of US adults aged 50 and older. Using pooled data from Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) and Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans (STAR) cohorts (n = 2,622), we applied multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) to investigate variation in executive function, memory, and language across 24 intersectional strata defined by gender, race/ethnicity, and self-reported experiences of everyday and major lifetime discrimination. Model main effects indicate that the additive effects of gender, race/ethnicity, and discrimination experience explained most between-strata variance for all cognitive domains. Variables that define intersectional strata accounted for 17.9% of overall variance in executive function for strata that included everyday discrimination, and 17.1% of variance for strata that included lifetime discrimination. The effects of stratum-defining variables were modest for memory and language (7.7%-11.6%). However, examining by level of perceived discrimination shows cognitive performance variation within and between ethnoracially and gender-defined groups in all cognitive domains. While the effect of discrimination exposure on cognitive performance varied, the additivity of effects suggests that intervention strategies to promote equity in cognitive health should be universal while tailored to the specific needs of ethnoracially and gender-defined groups experiencing discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2460
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Interpersonal Discrimination, and Cognitive Performance: An Intersectional Analysis

Timothy J. Hohman, Ganga Bey, Natalie A. Rivadeneira, Julia Libby
Innovation in Aging
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Interpersonal Discrimination, and Cognitive Performance: An Intersectional Analysis

Timothy J. Hohman, Ganga Bey, Natalie A. Rivadeneira, Julia Libby
article en

Abstract

Abstract Previous research has shown that interpersonal discrimination affects cognitive health disparities across gender and race/ethnicity. However, the impact of belonging to multiple social groups on these experiences is rarely considered. We applied an intersectional perspective to examine how gender, race/ethnicity, and interpersonal discrimination intersect to socially pattern cognitive performance in a cohort of US adults aged 50 and older. Using pooled data from Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) and Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans (STAR) cohorts (n = 2,622), we applied multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) to investigate variation in executive function, memory, and language across 24 intersectional strata defined by gender, race/ethnicity, and self-reported experiences of everyday and major lifetime discrimination. Model main effects indicate that the additive effects of gender, race/ethnicity, and discrimination experience explained most between-strata variance for all cognitive domains. Variables that define intersectional strata accounted for 17.9% of overall variance in executive function for strata that included everyday discrimination, and 17.1% of variance for strata that included lifetime discrimination. The effects of stratum-defining variables were modest for memory and language (7.7%-11.6%). However, examining by level of perceived discrimination shows cognitive performance variation within and between ethnoracially and gender-defined groups in all cognitive domains. While the effect of discrimination exposure on cognitive performance varied, the additivity of effects suggests that intervention strategies to promote equity in cognitive health should be universal while tailored to the specific needs of ethnoracially and gender-defined groups experiencing discrimination.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of North Carolina Health Care (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.