Factors Associated with Dissatisfaction with Out-of-Pocket Medical Costs Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Abstract Out-of-pocket medical expenses remain a substantial concern for many Medicare beneficiaries, particularly those with high care needs and limited income. The objective of this study was to examine factors (i.e., sociodemographic characteristics, health status, insurance coverage and benefits) associated with dissatisfaction with out-of-pocket medical costs among Medicare beneficiaries. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 9,960 adults aged 65 years and older from the 2022 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File (weighted N = 51.7million). The dependent variable was self-reported satisfaction with out-of-pocket costs, dichotomized as satisfied versus dissatisfied. A survey-weighted logistic regression model identified factors associated with dissatisfaction. Overall, 12.4% (6.4million) reported dissatisfaction. Higher odds of dissatisfaction were associated with age 65–74 years versus ≥75 (OR = 1.41,P< 0.001), non-Hispanic Black (OR = 1.44,P=0.011) or other race/ethnicity (vs non-Hispanic White), income ≤120% federal poverty level (FPL) (OR = 1.46,P=0.023) or > 120% to ≤ 200% FPL (vs > 200% FPL), 1–2 limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) (OR = 1.60,P< 0.001) or ≥ 3 limitations (vs no functional limitations), reporting good general health (OR = 1.31,P=0.001) or fair/poor health (vs excellent/very good), having a Part D plan (vs no) (OR = 1.29,P=0.033), and self-purchased private insurance (vs no) (OR = 1.30,P=0.013). Full-year Medicare Advantage enrollment (vs. full-year fee-for-service) (OR = 0.62,P< 0.001) and dual Medicare–Medicaid eligibility (vs no dual) (OR = 0.34,P< 0.001) were protective factors against dissatisfaction. These findings highlight inequities in out-of-pocket costs satisfaction among socioeconomically and medically vulnerable older adults. Policy reforms aimed at expanding supplemental coverage and providing targeted financial assistance could improve out-of-pocket cost-related satisfaction and advance health equity in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.4116
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Associated with Dissatisfaction with Out-of-Pocket Medical Costs Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Boon Peng Ng, Andrew Chern
Innovation in Aging
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Factors Associated with Dissatisfaction with Out-of-Pocket Medical Costs Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Boon Peng Ng, Andrew Chern
article en

Abstract

Abstract Out-of-pocket medical expenses remain a substantial concern for many Medicare beneficiaries, particularly those with high care needs and limited income. The objective of this study was to examine factors (i.e., sociodemographic characteristics, health status, insurance coverage and benefits) associated with dissatisfaction with out-of-pocket medical costs among Medicare beneficiaries. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 9,960 adults aged 65 years and older from the 2022 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File (weighted N = 51.7million). The dependent variable was self-reported satisfaction with out-of-pocket costs, dichotomized as satisfied versus dissatisfied. A survey-weighted logistic regression model identified factors associated with dissatisfaction. Overall, 12.4% (6.4million) reported dissatisfaction. Higher odds of dissatisfaction were associated with age 65–74 years versus ≥75 (OR = 1.41,P< 0.001), non-Hispanic Black (OR = 1.44,P=0.011) or other race/ethnicity (vs non-Hispanic White), income ≤120% federal poverty level (FPL) (OR = 1.46,P=0.023) or > 120% to ≤ 200% FPL (vs > 200% FPL), 1–2 limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) (OR = 1.60,P< 0.001) or ≥ 3 limitations (vs no functional limitations), reporting good general health (OR = 1.31,P=0.001) or fair/poor health (vs excellent/very good), having a Part D plan (vs no) (OR = 1.29,P=0.033), and self-purchased private insurance (vs no) (OR = 1.30,P=0.013). Full-year Medicare Advantage enrollment (vs. full-year fee-for-service) (OR = 0.62,P< 0.001) and dual Medicare–Medicaid eligibility (vs no dual) (OR = 0.34,P< 0.001) were protective factors against dissatisfaction. These findings highlight inequities in out-of-pocket costs satisfaction among socioeconomically and medically vulnerable older adults. Policy reforms aimed at expanding supplemental coverage and providing targeted financial assistance could improve out-of-pocket cost-related satisfaction and advance health equity in this population.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Central Florida (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.