Addressing Nursing Home Residents’ Goals, Preferences, and Priority: A Local and National Imperative

Abstract The regulatory F-tag F656—Comprehensive Care Plans—is consistently among the top ten most cited deficiencies in nursing home surveys, highlighting a widespread challenge: nursing homes often lack the resources or processes to meaningfully address residents’ goals, preferences, and priorities (GPPs). To address this gap, we developed a practical, user-friendly guide to help nursing home staff engage residents in conversations about what matters most to them and integrate those insights into care plans and ultimately into daily care provided. In partnership with the Kansas State University Center on Aging, we are piloting this guide and process in up to 30 nursing homes. The pilot includes education on goal-concordant care, structured action planning for individualized quality improvement (QI) projects, and evaluation of implementation progress. Findings from this pilot will inform revisions to the guide and underlying process to prepare for broader dissemination. In addition to improving person-centered care at the nursing home level, we share preliminary lessons that could inform the design of health information technology (HIT) systems capable of capturing and exchanging resident GPPs across care settings. We also consider how structured approaches to GPPs could contribute to the development of goal-concordance measures with relevance for federal regulation and quality monitoring. This paper shares the design, implementation strategy, and early insights from this ongoing initiative, along with its broader implications for systems change in long-term care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1985
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing Nursing Home Residents’ Goals, Preferences, and Priority: A Local and National Imperative

Laci Cornelison, Addison Van Zutphen
Innovation in Aging
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Addressing Nursing Home Residents’ Goals, Preferences, and Priority: A Local and National Imperative

Laci Cornelison, Addison Van Zutphen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The regulatory F-tag F656—Comprehensive Care Plans—is consistently among the top ten most cited deficiencies in nursing home surveys, highlighting a widespread challenge: nursing homes often lack the resources or processes to meaningfully address residents’ goals, preferences, and priorities (GPPs). To address this gap, we developed a practical, user-friendly guide to help nursing home staff engage residents in conversations about what matters most to them and integrate those insights into care plans and ultimately into daily care provided. In partnership with the Kansas State University Center on Aging, we are piloting this guide and process in up to 30 nursing homes. The pilot includes education on goal-concordant care, structured action planning for individualized quality improvement (QI) projects, and evaluation of implementation progress. Findings from this pilot will inform revisions to the guide and underlying process to prepare for broader dissemination. In addition to improving person-centered care at the nursing home level, we share preliminary lessons that could inform the design of health information technology (HIT) systems capable of capturing and exchanging resident GPPs across care settings. We also consider how structured approaches to GPPs could contribute to the development of goal-concordance measures with relevance for federal regulation and quality monitoring. This paper shares the design, implementation strategy, and early insights from this ongoing initiative, along with its broader implications for systems change in long-term care.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Kansas State University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.