Patient and Caregiver Experiences of Navigating the “Seesaw” of Hospice Live Discharge

Abstract The receipt of quality hospice care may prompt changes in patient eligibility under Medicare’s prognostic requirement of 6 months or less. In 2022, 224,900 hospice beneficiaries across the United States were discharged alive from hospice care, with 6.1% discharged due to “no longer being terminally ill.” This critical care transition is associated with losing important hospice-based supports and questions if to re-enroll back onto hospice care. Previous research is limited on how patients and caregivers navigate countervailing positive and negative reactions that shape this phenomenon. The current study aimed to address this gap by exploring the experience of service coordination and potential impacts to quality-of-life post-discharge. With a purposive sample of 32 patient-caregiver dyads, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were analyzed via thematic analysis. Results were characterized by navigating a process of ups and downs with varying questions about whether the patient was maintaining eligibility, akin to a seesaw. Specifically, caregivers described an uncertainty regarding how hospice patients managed to “get better” to warrant discharge, when their needs for assistance remained the same. Other caregivers cast doubt on if discharge was necessary or even appropriate. Whereas nearly half of participants referred to live discharge as incongruent with their goals for care, the experiences associated with navigating live discharge (both positive and negative) led others to question if they would want the patient to re-enroll in hospice in the future. These results suggest a need to develop and examine robust services to support patient and caregiver transitions from hospice care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2009
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient and Caregiver Experiences of Navigating the “Seesaw” of Hospice Live Discharge

Leslie Hinyard, Stephanie P. Wladkowski, Joseph Trinitas, Verna L. Hendricks-Ferguson et al.
Innovation in Aging
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Patient and Caregiver Experiences of Navigating the “Seesaw” of Hospice Live Discharge

Leslie Hinyard, Stephanie P. Wladkowski, Joseph Trinitas, Verna L. Hendricks-Ferguson, Todd Becker, Cara Wallace, Ruaa Al Juboori
article en

Abstract

Abstract The receipt of quality hospice care may prompt changes in patient eligibility under Medicare’s prognostic requirement of 6 months or less. In 2022, 224,900 hospice beneficiaries across the United States were discharged alive from hospice care, with 6.1% discharged due to “no longer being terminally ill.” This critical care transition is associated with losing important hospice-based supports and questions if to re-enroll back onto hospice care. Previous research is limited on how patients and caregivers navigate countervailing positive and negative reactions that shape this phenomenon. The current study aimed to address this gap by exploring the experience of service coordination and potential impacts to quality-of-life post-discharge. With a purposive sample of 32 patient-caregiver dyads, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were analyzed via thematic analysis. Results were characterized by navigating a process of ups and downs with varying questions about whether the patient was maintaining eligibility, akin to a seesaw. Specifically, caregivers described an uncertainty regarding how hospice patients managed to “get better” to warrant discharge, when their needs for assistance remained the same. Other caregivers cast doubt on if discharge was necessary or even appropriate. Whereas nearly half of participants referred to live discharge as incongruent with their goals for care, the experiences associated with navigating live discharge (both positive and negative) led others to question if they would want the patient to re-enroll in hospice in the future. These results suggest a need to develop and examine robust services to support patient and caregiver transitions from hospice care.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Bowling Green State University (US), Saint Louis University (ES), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Missouri–St. Louis (US), Saint Louis Science Center (US), University of Mississippi (US), Anheuser-Busch InBev (Belgium) (BE), Saint Louis University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.