Uncovering Dynamics of End-of-Life Decision Making Among Individuals at Risk of ADRD: Insights from Clinical Data

Abstract This study examined how personal and relational factors from both patients and their caregivers influence advance care planning (ACP) decisions in real-world clinical settings. We focused on four outcomes central to end-of-life decision-making: discussion of end-of-life wishes, designation of financial and health care powers of attorney, and recognition of palliative or hospice care appropriateness. We analyzed data from individuals aged 40 and older who completed computerized cognitive care planning following cognitive assessment failures (n = 522). We applied logistic regression models to identify predictors of ACP engagement, incorporating variables from both patients and caregivers. Among patient-related factors, older age and higher education were consistently associated with increased ACP engagement. In contrast, patients identifying as Non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic/Latino were significantly less likely to engage in end-of-life discussions or designate proxies. Lower functional status also predicted greater planning activity. Caregiver-related predictors revealed that moderate stress and awareness of support resources were positively associated with proxy designation and hospice recognition. However, frequent weekly contact with the patient and perceived ability to provide care were negatively associated with ACP outcomes. Higher caregiver depression scores were linked to a reduced likelihood of health care proxy designation. These findings highlight the importance of dyadic and contextual influences in shaping ACP decisions. Emotional readiness, relational dynamics, and caregiving burden play critical roles in whether and how planning occurs. Our results underscore the need for interventions that recognize the shared nature of end-of-life decision-making and support both parties in navigating the emotional and interpersonal challenges of caregiving.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.4251
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering Dynamics of End-of-Life Decision Making Among Individuals at Risk of ADRD: Insights from Clinical Data

Shaoqing Ge, Katherine Britt, Bin Huang, Qingyi Jasmine Zeng
Innovation in Aging
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Uncovering Dynamics of End-of-Life Decision Making Among Individuals at Risk of ADRD: Insights from Clinical Data

Shaoqing Ge, Katherine Britt, Bin Huang, Qingyi Jasmine Zeng
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examined how personal and relational factors from both patients and their caregivers influence advance care planning (ACP) decisions in real-world clinical settings. We focused on four outcomes central to end-of-life decision-making: discussion of end-of-life wishes, designation of financial and health care powers of attorney, and recognition of palliative or hospice care appropriateness. We analyzed data from individuals aged 40 and older who completed computerized cognitive care planning following cognitive assessment failures (n = 522). We applied logistic regression models to identify predictors of ACP engagement, incorporating variables from both patients and caregivers. Among patient-related factors, older age and higher education were consistently associated with increased ACP engagement. In contrast, patients identifying as Non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic/Latino were significantly less likely to engage in end-of-life discussions or designate proxies. Lower functional status also predicted greater planning activity. Caregiver-related predictors revealed that moderate stress and awareness of support resources were positively associated with proxy designation and hospice recognition. However, frequent weekly contact with the patient and perceived ability to provide care were negatively associated with ACP outcomes. Higher caregiver depression scores were linked to a reduced likelihood of health care proxy designation. These findings highlight the importance of dyadic and contextual influences in shaping ACP decisions. Emotional readiness, relational dynamics, and caregiving burden play critical roles in whether and how planning occurs. Our results underscore the need for interventions that recognize the shared nature of end-of-life decision-making and support both parties in navigating the emotional and interpersonal challenges of caregiving.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Iowa (US), Computer Aids for Chemical Engineering (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.