Association of Reported Collaboration Quality with Hospice Providers and Hospice Utilization in Assisted Living

Abstract Hospice is crucial in meeting the increasing care needs of dying residents in assisted living (AL) and supporting dying in place. We know little about how AL-hospice collaboration relates to staying in AL at the end of life. We conducted a national survey of AL administrators in 2021-2023 about end-of-life care processes in large ALs (25+ beds). The survey contained instruments adapted from other long-term care settings, including a Likert-scale with items about AL-hospice collaboration quality (e.g., AL staff know when to expect a hospice nurse visit for all/most/some/none of the time). The sample included 9,069 AL residents who died in 2021 or 2022 in 1,501 surveyed ALs. We operationalized “staying in place with support at the end of life” as the number of days with hospice in AL in the last 90 days of life, excluding days receiving hospice in other settings. Two-part models were used to estimate the relationship between reported AL-hospice collaboration quality and days receiving hospice in AL, accounting for individual-, AL-, and market-level characteristics. Decedents spent 2.6 more days on hospice in AL (95% CI: 1.1, 4.2) if administrators reported residents were always assessed within 24 hours of hospice referrals, compared to residents in ALs where this happened none/some/most of the time. This difference represents 11% more days in place for residents who lived in ALs where administrators reported that hospice providers always respond timely to hospice referrals. The collaboration between hospice and AL staff is a modifiable factor that can improve end-of-life care experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.704
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of Reported Collaboration Quality with Hospice Providers and Hospice Utilization in Assisted Living

Joan M. Teno, Emmanuelle Bélanger, Pedro Gozalo, Xiao Wang et al.
Innovation in Aging
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Association of Reported Collaboration Quality with Hospice Providers and Hospice Utilization in Assisted Living

Joan M. Teno, Emmanuelle Bélanger, Pedro Gozalo, Xiao Wang, Melissa Clark, Kali Thomas
article en

Abstract

Abstract Hospice is crucial in meeting the increasing care needs of dying residents in assisted living (AL) and supporting dying in place. We know little about how AL-hospice collaboration relates to staying in AL at the end of life. We conducted a national survey of AL administrators in 2021-2023 about end-of-life care processes in large ALs (25+ beds). The survey contained instruments adapted from other long-term care settings, including a Likert-scale with items about AL-hospice collaboration quality (e.g., AL staff know when to expect a hospice nurse visit for all/most/some/none of the time). The sample included 9,069 AL residents who died in 2021 or 2022 in 1,501 surveyed ALs. We operationalized “staying in place with support at the end of life” as the number of days with hospice in AL in the last 90 days of life, excluding days receiving hospice in other settings. Two-part models were used to estimate the relationship between reported AL-hospice collaboration quality and days receiving hospice in AL, accounting for individual-, AL-, and market-level characteristics. Decedents spent 2.6 more days on hospice in AL (95% CI: 1.1, 4.2) if administrators reported residents were always assessed within 24 hours of hospice referrals, compared to residents in ALs where this happened none/some/most of the time. This difference represents 11% more days in place for residents who lived in ALs where administrators reported that hospice providers always respond timely to hospice referrals. The collaboration between hospice and AL staff is a modifiable factor that can improve end-of-life care experiences.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Brown University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.