Out of sight is out of mind? Experimentally testing a gradually materializing public bad
• If harm to themselves is postponed, participants become less cautious. • If harm to others is postponed, participants become less cautious. • Participants only respond once their own payoff turns negative. • In a public bad, out of sight is out of mind. Many social ills can be modeled as a public bad. In such scenarios, private benefit is often immediate, while the public damage takes some time to materialize. In this experiment, we investigate the behavioral effects caused by such delays in the realization of collective harm. By manipulating the weight with which the damages caused by group contributions are carried over to the next round, we alter the number of periods required for the social damage to unfold fully. We keep constant the economic consequences of contributions between treatments (by introducing a multiplier for the damage) and between periods (by deducting all unrealized harm at the end of the game) to avoid multiple equilibria. In a second treatment dimension, we isolate the cognitive challenges of this experiment by replacing human group members with “computerized players” that perfectly copy each subject’s previous behavior. We find that participants’ behavior is less cooperative over time when harm is deferred into the future. Our results also suggest that the driving mechanism behind this effect is not insufficient anticipation, but the lack of having experienced the negative consequences of the public damage.
Authors
- Alexander Egberts
- Christoph Engel
- Joshua Fairfield
Institutions
- Washington and Lee University (US)
- Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Economic Psychology
- Published
- 2026-01-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2026.102877
- Primary Topic
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00