Out of sight is out of mind? Experimentally testing a gradually materializing public bad

• If harm to themselves is postponed, participants become less cautious. • If harm to others is postponed, participants become less cautious. • Participants only respond once their own payoff turns negative. • In a public bad, out of sight is out of mind. Many social ills can be modeled as a public bad. In such scenarios, private benefit is often immediate, while the public damage takes some time to materialize. In this experiment, we investigate the behavioral effects caused by such delays in the realization of collective harm. By manipulating the weight with which the damages caused by group contributions are carried over to the next round, we alter the number of periods required for the social damage to unfold fully. We keep constant the economic consequences of contributions between treatments (by introducing a multiplier for the damage) and between periods (by deducting all unrealized harm at the end of the game) to avoid multiple equilibria. In a second treatment dimension, we isolate the cognitive challenges of this experiment by replacing human group members with “computerized players” that perfectly copy each subject’s previous behavior. We find that participants’ behavior is less cooperative over time when harm is deferred into the future. Our results also suggest that the driving mechanism behind this effect is not insufficient anticipation, but the lack of having experienced the negative consequences of the public damage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Psychology
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2026.102877
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Out of sight is out of mind? Experimentally testing a gradually materializing public bad

Alexander Egberts, Christoph Engel, Joshua Fairfield
Journal of Economic Psychology
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Out of sight is out of mind? Experimentally testing a gradually materializing public bad

Alexander Egberts, Christoph Engel, Joshua Fairfield
article en

Abstract

• If harm to themselves is postponed, participants become less cautious. • If harm to others is postponed, participants become less cautious. • Participants only respond once their own payoff turns negative. • In a public bad, out of sight is out of mind. Many social ills can be modeled as a public bad. In such scenarios, private benefit is often immediate, while the public damage takes some time to materialize. In this experiment, we investigate the behavioral effects caused by such delays in the realization of collective harm. By manipulating the weight with which the damages caused by group contributions are carried over to the next round, we alter the number of periods required for the social damage to unfold fully. We keep constant the economic consequences of contributions between treatments (by introducing a multiplier for the damage) and between periods (by deducting all unrealized harm at the end of the game) to avoid multiple equilibria. In a second treatment dimension, we isolate the cognitive challenges of this experiment by replacing human group members with “computerized players” that perfectly copy each subject’s previous behavior. We find that participants’ behavior is less cooperative over time when harm is deferred into the future. Our results also suggest that the driving mechanism behind this effect is not insufficient anticipation, but the lack of having experienced the negative consequences of the public damage.

Journal of Economic PsychologyVol. 113
Washington and Lee University (US), Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.