Balancing Closeness and Detachment in Family Dementia Caregiving: A Mixed Methods Review

Abstract Background Caring for a family member with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) involves significant relational shifts, including changes in reciprocity, emotional closeness, and relational strain. While caregiver burden is well-documented, less is known about how caregivers perceive and adapt to changes in relationship closeness and whether closeness is uniformly beneficial. Objectives This mixed methods systematic review examines (1) how family caregivers experience changes in relationship closeness, (2) the psychosocial factors that predict closening versus detachment, and (3) the impact of perceived closeness on caregiver well-being and caregiving outcomes. Methods A systematic search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and ProQuest. Inclusion criteria required empirical, peer-reviewed studies published since 2015 focusing on relational closeness in spousal ADRD caregiving. A total of 15 studies met the criteria. Results Three themes emerged: (1) shifting relational roles, (2) emotional adaptation, and (3) the bidirectional impact of closeness on caregiver and care recipient well-being. Some caregivers experienced deepened bonds, particularly when they maintained a sense of partnership despite role transitions. Others experienced detachment, often as a psychological buffer against the emotional distress of declining reciprocity. Closeness was typically linked to lower burden and greater resilience, but also greater anticipatory grief and distress. Conclusion Closeness is not universally beneficial; while it can foster resilience, it may also intensify grief and distress. Future research should explore longitudinal trajectories of closeness and assess whether interventions (e.g., dyadic counseling, structured grief support) can help caregivers balance emotional connection with adaptive coping strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2916
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Closeness and Detachment in Family Dementia Caregiving: A Mixed Methods Review

Gavin Green, Elizabeth B. Fauth, Heather Kelly, Josey Batura
Innovation in Aging
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Balancing Closeness and Detachment in Family Dementia Caregiving: A Mixed Methods Review

Gavin Green, Elizabeth B. Fauth, Heather Kelly, Josey Batura
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Caring for a family member with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) involves significant relational shifts, including changes in reciprocity, emotional closeness, and relational strain. While caregiver burden is well-documented, less is known about how caregivers perceive and adapt to changes in relationship closeness and whether closeness is uniformly beneficial. Objectives This mixed methods systematic review examines (1) how family caregivers experience changes in relationship closeness, (2) the psychosocial factors that predict closening versus detachment, and (3) the impact of perceived closeness on caregiver well-being and caregiving outcomes. Methods A systematic search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and ProQuest. Inclusion criteria required empirical, peer-reviewed studies published since 2015 focusing on relational closeness in spousal ADRD caregiving. A total of 15 studies met the criteria. Results Three themes emerged: (1) shifting relational roles, (2) emotional adaptation, and (3) the bidirectional impact of closeness on caregiver and care recipient well-being. Some caregivers experienced deepened bonds, particularly when they maintained a sense of partnership despite role transitions. Others experienced detachment, often as a psychological buffer against the emotional distress of declining reciprocity. Closeness was typically linked to lower burden and greater resilience, but also greater anticipatory grief and distress. Conclusion Closeness is not universally beneficial; while it can foster resilience, it may also intensify grief and distress. Future research should explore longitudinal trajectories of closeness and assess whether interventions (e.g., dyadic counseling, structured grief support) can help caregivers balance emotional connection with adaptive coping strategies.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Utah State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.