Cancer Care Partners’ Transitions in Self-identity from Pre-Cancer into Survivorship: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Abstract Cancer survivors’ transitions from diagnosis into post-treatment life are well-described. Care partners’ transition experiences, however, remain underrepresented. Our mixed methods study combined NLP and qualitative analysis to examine shifts in care partners’ self-identity from pre-cancer into survivorship. We enrolled n = 18 spouses/partners (n = 9 women, n = 9 men) of post-treatment survivors. Participants completed two free listing exercises and two interviews describing “who am I” before and after cancer. Selected LIWC linguistic markers measures identity-related and affective content, and Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests compared differences pre/post cancer and by gender. Abductive interview coding, integrating transition theory concepts and inductive analysis, identified themes. When describing their before-cancer self-identity, participants used more positive (Mdn = 96.94 vs. 54.60, p = .025) and self-focused language (Mdn = 0.50 vs. 3.50, p = .008). Post-cancer descriptions were more relational in focus with more “we” language (Mdn = 0.00 vs. 1.00, p = .009) with more negative affect, including anxiety (p = .019), and sadness (p = .043). Described changes in self-identity evoked uncertainty, role ambiguity, evolving relationship dynamics, and dissatisfaction with available identity labels. Participants rejected “caregiver’ as too unidirectional and “survivor” as inapt, while also describing their experiences a life- and identity-changing transition. Care partners lack a shared, recognized vocabulary to articulate their survivorship experiences, challenging their ability to find meaning in and connect with current survivorship discourse. Health care providers can support and validate care partners’ identities through person-centered communication that uses their language, acknowledges their unique experiences, and assesses their unique support needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.798
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cancer Care Partners’ Transitions in Self-identity from Pre-Cancer into Survivorship: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Lanell M. Bellury, Linda S. Edelman, Ann Jones, Kristin G. Cloyes et al.
Innovation in Aging
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Cancer Care Partners’ Transitions in Self-identity from Pre-Cancer into Survivorship: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Lanell M. Bellury, Linda S. Edelman, Ann Jones, Kristin G. Cloyes, Darryl Somayaji, Lee Ellington
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cancer survivors’ transitions from diagnosis into post-treatment life are well-described. Care partners’ transition experiences, however, remain underrepresented. Our mixed methods study combined NLP and qualitative analysis to examine shifts in care partners’ self-identity from pre-cancer into survivorship. We enrolled n = 18 spouses/partners (n = 9 women, n = 9 men) of post-treatment survivors. Participants completed two free listing exercises and two interviews describing “who am I” before and after cancer. Selected LIWC linguistic markers measures identity-related and affective content, and Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests compared differences pre/post cancer and by gender. Abductive interview coding, integrating transition theory concepts and inductive analysis, identified themes. When describing their before-cancer self-identity, participants used more positive (Mdn = 96.94 vs. 54.60, p = .025) and self-focused language (Mdn = 0.50 vs. 3.50, p = .008). Post-cancer descriptions were more relational in focus with more “we” language (Mdn = 0.00 vs. 1.00, p = .009) with more negative affect, including anxiety (p = .019), and sadness (p = .043). Described changes in self-identity evoked uncertainty, role ambiguity, evolving relationship dynamics, and dissatisfaction with available identity labels. Participants rejected “caregiver’ as too unidirectional and “survivor” as inapt, while also describing their experiences a life- and identity-changing transition. Care partners lack a shared, recognized vocabulary to articulate their survivorship experiences, challenging their ability to find meaning in and connect with current survivorship discourse. Health care providers can support and validate care partners’ identities through person-centered communication that uses their language, acknowledges their unique experiences, and assesses their unique support needs.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Mercer University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), University of Utah (US), Iowa Western Community College (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.