Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Aging Rates in the Primate Lineage

Abstract Median lifespans of primates show nearly 10-fold variation, ranging from ∼8 years in marmosets to ∼80 years in humans. The molecular mechanisms that govern this variation and how they evolved remain poorly understood. In this study, we implemented a novel phylogenetic Gompertzian survival framework to leverage the evolutionary history of primates in order to estimate parameters of aging for 38 captive primate species. We find that baseline hazards (at the time of sexual maturity) and adult aging rates display significant variation, and aging rates are more evolutionarily conserved than baseline hazards (Pagel lambda=0.96 vs lambda=0.34, respectively). Furthermore, we find that aging rates and baseline hazards do not show a pattern of phylogenetic covariation, suggesting differential evolutionary pressures may act on these traits. Aging rates were strongly correlated with body weights, with a notable exception within the Ape family, where aging rates remained approximately unchanged despite large differences in body weight. Based on the reconstruction of ancestral aging rates, we estimate that the ancestor of Apes was likely aging at a similar rate to modern humans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2302
Primary Topic
Primate Behavior and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Aging Rates in the Primate Lineage

Joseph W. Kemnitz, Wendy Newton, Eugene Melamud
Innovation in Aging
Primate Behavior and Ecology
article

Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Aging Rates in the Primate Lineage

Joseph W. Kemnitz, Wendy Newton, Eugene Melamud
article en

Abstract

Abstract Median lifespans of primates show nearly 10-fold variation, ranging from ∼8 years in marmosets to ∼80 years in humans. The molecular mechanisms that govern this variation and how they evolved remain poorly understood. In this study, we implemented a novel phylogenetic Gompertzian survival framework to leverage the evolutionary history of primates in order to estimate parameters of aging for 38 captive primate species. We find that baseline hazards (at the time of sexual maturity) and adult aging rates display significant variation, and aging rates are more evolutionarily conserved than baseline hazards (Pagel lambda=0.96 vs lambda=0.34, respectively). Furthermore, we find that aging rates and baseline hazards do not show a pattern of phylogenetic covariation, suggesting differential evolutionary pressures may act on these traits. Aging rates were strongly correlated with body weights, with a notable exception within the Ape family, where aging rates remained approximately unchanged despite large differences in body weight. Based on the reconstruction of ancestral aging rates, we estimate that the ancestor of Apes was likely aging at a similar rate to modern humans.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Caucaseco Scientific Research Center (CO), Wisconsin Disability Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Primate Behavior and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.