Citizenship Education and Exclusion: An Analysis of Authorized History Textbooks and Children’s Books in Ontario, 1866-1950

From the advent of the Liberal government of Wilfred Laurier in 1896, to the Citizenship Act of 1947, the Ontario Department of Education facilitated the teaching of citizenship education through its authorization of history textbooks. Using a critical discourse analysis framework constructed from the theories and analyses of five prominent historians: Reinhart Koselleck, Edward Said, Quentin Skinner, Ken Osborne and Ian McKay, this paper explores how a principle of exclusion was pivotal in supporting an Anglocentric nationalist agenda. History textbooks are examined for evidence of the exclusion of women, Indigenous peoples, immigrants, people of colour, and the working class. This exploration is compared with an examination of children’s books written during the same period. The aim of the comparison is to identify possible alternative citizenship ideals that emerge in fictional narratives as compared with authorized historical narratives, a comparison that, as yet, has not been done before.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Encounters in Theory and History of Education
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/encounters.v26i0.19950
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citizenship Education and Exclusion: An Analysis of Authorized History Textbooks and Children’s Books in Ontario, 1866-1950

Philip Roy
Encounters in Theory and History of Education
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
article

Citizenship Education and Exclusion: An Analysis of Authorized History Textbooks and Children’s Books in Ontario, 1866-1950

Philip Roy
article en

Abstract

From the advent of the Liberal government of Wilfred Laurier in 1896, to the Citizenship Act of 1947, the Ontario Department of Education facilitated the teaching of citizenship education through its authorization of history textbooks. Using a critical discourse analysis framework constructed from the theories and analyses of five prominent historians: Reinhart Koselleck, Edward Said, Quentin Skinner, Ken Osborne and Ian McKay, this paper explores how a principle of exclusion was pivotal in supporting an Anglocentric nationalist agenda. History textbooks are examined for evidence of the exclusion of women, Indigenous peoples, immigrants, people of colour, and the working class. This exploration is compared with an examination of children’s books written during the same period. The aim of the comparison is to identify possible alternative citizenship ideals that emerge in fictional narratives as compared with authorized historical narratives, a comparison that, as yet, has not been done before.

Encounters in Theory and History of EducationVol. 26
Queen's University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Citizenship Education and Exclusion: An Analysis of Authorized History Textbooks and Children’s Books in Ontario, 1866-1950 — Philip Roy · Encounters in Theory and History of Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS