Collaboration challenges in multidisciplinary audit teams for public sector assurance

Purpose This study examines how multidisciplinary audit teams (MATs) collaborate in sustainability assurance engagements, focusing on an Australian government organisation responsible for natural resource management assurance. Specifically, it explores how MATs are resourced, how diverse expertise is integrated and managed, and the collaboration challenges arising from this diversity, as well as their perceived impact on assurance quality. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative case study approach was undertaken, drawing primarily on semi-structured interviews with multidisciplinary audit team members, including auditors, managers and contractors. Resource diversity theory was applied as a lens to examine how MATs were composed, managed and the collaboration challenges they encountered in assurance practice. Findings The study highlights that diverse expertise within MATs can enhance assurance quality, but these benefits are contingent on strategic planning, effective communication, and strong leadership. Where engagement was limited and communication unclear, tensions arose that undermined trust, impeded knowledge transfer and restricted collaboration, ultimately diminishing the effectiveness of MATs. Research limitations/implications The study highlights the importance of structured engagement strategies, robust communication protocols, and leadership development in enabling MATs to realise the benefits of multidisciplinarity. By strengthening these areas, organisations (private and public) can improve collaboration, build trust and integrate diverse knowledge more effectively to enhance the quality of sustainability assurance. Originality/value This study provides rare in-field insights into the collaborative dynamics of MATs in sustainability assurance in the public sector. It identifies the organisational conditions necessary for leveraging multidisciplinary expertise and addresses a significant gap in the literature on the effectiveness of audit team diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-04-2025-0098
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaboration challenges in multidisciplinary audit teams for public sector assurance

Angela Hecimovic
Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Collaboration challenges in multidisciplinary audit teams for public sector assurance

Angela Hecimovic
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how multidisciplinary audit teams (MATs) collaborate in sustainability assurance engagements, focusing on an Australian government organisation responsible for natural resource management assurance. Specifically, it explores how MATs are resourced, how diverse expertise is integrated and managed, and the collaboration challenges arising from this diversity, as well as their perceived impact on assurance quality. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative case study approach was undertaken, drawing primarily on semi-structured interviews with multidisciplinary audit team members, including auditors, managers and contractors. Resource diversity theory was applied as a lens to examine how MATs were composed, managed and the collaboration challenges they encountered in assurance practice. Findings The study highlights that diverse expertise within MATs can enhance assurance quality, but these benefits are contingent on strategic planning, effective communication, and strong leadership. Where engagement was limited and communication unclear, tensions arose that undermined trust, impeded knowledge transfer and restricted collaboration, ultimately diminishing the effectiveness of MATs. Research limitations/implications The study highlights the importance of structured engagement strategies, robust communication protocols, and leadership development in enabling MATs to realise the benefits of multidisciplinarity. By strengthening these areas, organisations (private and public) can improve collaboration, build trust and integrate diverse knowledge more effectively to enhance the quality of sustainability assurance. Originality/value This study provides rare in-field insights into the collaborative dynamics of MATs in sustainability assurance in the public sector. It identifies the organisational conditions necessary for leveraging multidisciplinary expertise and addresses a significant gap in the literature on the effectiveness of audit team diversity.

Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial ManagementVol. 38(6)
Institute on Governance (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.