Exploring Motivation to Participate in Cognitive Training Across Underrepresented Groups in Clinical Research

Abstract Challenges with participant recruitment and lack of sample diversity are common problems in clinical research. The Alzheimer’s Association highlights the need for more heterogeneous samples in clinical research; underrepresented groups in clinical research can be categorized by demographic characteristics, including race/ethnicity, gender, and participant age. In particular, more effective recruitment for Latinos/Hispanics, Blacks/African Americans, males, and old-old adults (≥75 years) is needed. The goal of the current study was to explore motivations for participating in an Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) prevention trial and to examine whether motivations differed by demographic characteristics associated with underrepresented groups in clinical research. Cognitively healthy older adults (N = 5,721, Mage= 71.5 + 5.0) enrolled in the Preventing Alzheimer’s with Cognitive Training (PACT) trial completed open-ended questions assessing motivations for participation. Thematic analyses were conducted to identify motivational topics. Demographic subgroup differences were analyzed using chi-square and logistic regression analyses. Concern about brain health was the most common motivational theme, followed by direct experience with ADRD and altruism. Motivations differed by gender, race, age, and education. Results suggest that focusing on brain health concerns may be effective for recruitment messaging in ADRD prevention trials. However, demographic differences in motivations suggest recruitment materials and messaging could be tailored to align with specific motivational factors among subgroups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.299
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Motivation to Participate in Cognitive Training Across Underrepresented Groups in Clinical Research

Lizbeth Vera Murillo, Angel Collie, Maria Vander Meulen, Kat Barrett et al.
Innovation in Aging
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Exploring Motivation to Participate in Cognitive Training Across Underrepresented Groups in Clinical Research

Lizbeth Vera Murillo, Angel Collie, Maria Vander Meulen, Kat Barrett, J O'Brien, Yuting Yang, Stacey Alvarez-Alvarado
article en

Abstract

Abstract Challenges with participant recruitment and lack of sample diversity are common problems in clinical research. The Alzheimer’s Association highlights the need for more heterogeneous samples in clinical research; underrepresented groups in clinical research can be categorized by demographic characteristics, including race/ethnicity, gender, and participant age. In particular, more effective recruitment for Latinos/Hispanics, Blacks/African Americans, males, and old-old adults (≥75 years) is needed. The goal of the current study was to explore motivations for participating in an Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) prevention trial and to examine whether motivations differed by demographic characteristics associated with underrepresented groups in clinical research. Cognitively healthy older adults (N = 5,721, Mage= 71.5 + 5.0) enrolled in the Preventing Alzheimer’s with Cognitive Training (PACT) trial completed open-ended questions assessing motivations for participation. Thematic analyses were conducted to identify motivational topics. Demographic subgroup differences were analyzed using chi-square and logistic regression analyses. Concern about brain health was the most common motivational theme, followed by direct experience with ADRD and altruism. Motivations differed by gender, race, age, and education. Results suggest that focusing on brain health concerns may be effective for recruitment messaging in ADRD prevention trials. However, demographic differences in motivations suggest recruitment materials and messaging could be tailored to align with specific motivational factors among subgroups.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Duke University (US), University of South Florida (US), Jacksonville University (US), Florida Orthopaedic Institute (US), AdventHealth Tampa (US), Clemson University (US), Florida College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.