Human First, Machine Second: Perspectives From the Age 85+ on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract Rapid advancements in the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked interest in its potential to support an aging population. Minimal work has examined how the oldest of older adults engage with and think about AI in their lives, despite this demographic being one that might especially benefit from AI technologies. Leveraging data from focus groups (N = 14) and a questionnaire (N = 25), this study examines a sample of the age 85+ and their attitudes toward, experiences with, and trust in AI. Participants were recruited from the MIT AgeLab’s 85+ Lifestyle Leaders Panel, a longitudinal study of octogenarians and nonagenarians. Initial findings indicate participants had low familiarity and experience with AI; greatest levels of familiarity were around AI-powered voice assistants. While participants expressed limited experience, many showed openness to learning about AI’s potential to support health and care management, cognition and memory, technology troubleshooting, and personal security. Participants preferred AI that enhanced rather than replaced human capabilities. Their reported concerns about AI centered on its surveillance capabilities, data security, and potential to reinforce social biases, particularly ageism. These findings underscore opportunities to better educate the age 85+ about AI, the advantages of involving them in AI design, and the need to consider how AI may contribute to or bridge digital divides within this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1370
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human First, Machine Second: Perspectives From the Age 85+ on Artificial Intelligence

Sophia Ashebir, Lisa D’Ambrosio, Taylor Brennan, Niels Wu
Innovation in Aging
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

Human First, Machine Second: Perspectives From the Age 85+ on Artificial Intelligence

Sophia Ashebir, Lisa D’Ambrosio, Taylor Brennan, Niels Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rapid advancements in the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked interest in its potential to support an aging population. Minimal work has examined how the oldest of older adults engage with and think about AI in their lives, despite this demographic being one that might especially benefit from AI technologies. Leveraging data from focus groups (N = 14) and a questionnaire (N = 25), this study examines a sample of the age 85+ and their attitudes toward, experiences with, and trust in AI. Participants were recruited from the MIT AgeLab’s 85+ Lifestyle Leaders Panel, a longitudinal study of octogenarians and nonagenarians. Initial findings indicate participants had low familiarity and experience with AI; greatest levels of familiarity were around AI-powered voice assistants. While participants expressed limited experience, many showed openness to learning about AI’s potential to support health and care management, cognition and memory, technology troubleshooting, and personal security. Participants preferred AI that enhanced rather than replaced human capabilities. Their reported concerns about AI centered on its surveillance capabilities, data security, and potential to reinforce social biases, particularly ageism. These findings underscore opportunities to better educate the age 85+ about AI, the advantages of involving them in AI design, and the need to consider how AI may contribute to or bridge digital divides within this population.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
IIT@MIT (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.