Generalization performance distributions along learning curves

• Research Highlights (Required) • A high-fidelity learning curve database is created. • Classifier performance distributions are investigated. • Performance distributions along learning curves often deviate from normality. • Differences in performance between models deviate from normal distributions. • Using alternative statistical measures alter model rankings along learning curves. Learning curves show the expected performance with respect to training set size. This is often used to evaluate and compare models, tune hyper-parameters and determine how much data is needed for a specific performance. However, the distributional properties of performance are frequently overlooked on learning curves. Generally, only an average with standard error or standard deviation is used. In this paper, we analyze the distributions of generalization performance on the learning curves. We compile a high-fidelity learning curve database, both with respect to training set size and repetitions of the sampling for a fixed training set size. Our investigation reveals that generalization performance rarely follows a Gaussian distribution for classical classifiers, regardless of dataset balance, loss function, sampling method, or hyper-parameter tuning along learning curves. Furthermore, we show that the choice of statistical summary, mean versus measures like quantiles affect the top model rankings. Our findings highlight the importance of considering different statistical measures and use of non-parametric approaches when evaluating and selecting machine learning models with learning curves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pattern Recognition Letters
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2026.01.003
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalization performance distributions along learning curves

David M. J. Tax, O. Taylan Turan, Marco Loog
Pattern Recognition Letters
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

Generalization performance distributions along learning curves

David M. J. Tax, O. Taylan Turan, Marco Loog
article en

Abstract

• Research Highlights (Required) • A high-fidelity learning curve database is created. • Classifier performance distributions are investigated. • Performance distributions along learning curves often deviate from normality. • Differences in performance between models deviate from normal distributions. • Using alternative statistical measures alter model rankings along learning curves. Learning curves show the expected performance with respect to training set size. This is often used to evaluate and compare models, tune hyper-parameters and determine how much data is needed for a specific performance. However, the distributional properties of performance are frequently overlooked on learning curves. Generally, only an average with standard error or standard deviation is used. In this paper, we analyze the distributions of generalization performance on the learning curves. We compile a high-fidelity learning curve database, both with respect to training set size and repetitions of the sampling for a fixed training set size. Our investigation reveals that generalization performance rarely follows a Gaussian distribution for classical classifiers, regardless of dataset balance, loss function, sampling method, or hyper-parameter tuning along learning curves. Furthermore, we show that the choice of statistical summary, mean versus measures like quantiles affect the top model rankings. Our findings highlight the importance of considering different statistical measures and use of non-parametric approaches when evaluating and selecting machine learning models with learning curves.

Pattern Recognition LettersVol. 201
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generalization performance distributions along learning curves — David M. J. Tax, O. Taylan Turan, et al. · Pattern Recognition Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS