Age Differences in Social Discounting and Charitable Giving in a U.S. Sample

Abstract Social discounting describes the tendency to show less generosity as social distance to the recipient increases. Prior studies examining age differences in social discounting suggest that older age is associated with greater generosity toward distant others (Pornpattananangkul et al., 2019; Gong et al., 2019). However, the generalizability of these findings is limited due to small sample sizes, comparisons of extreme age groups, and an exclusive focus on Asian samples. To address these gaps, a pre-registered study examined age differences in social discounting and charitable giving in a U.S. adult life-span sample (N = 432, aged 18-93, Mage = 51.23, SDage = 18.92, 50% female, 55% non-Hispanic White). We predicted that older age would be associated with lower social discounting and increased generosity across social distances and towards charities. The social discounting measure was adapted from Jones and Rachlin (2006) and involved five social distances (1/5/10/50/100, ranging from 0 = closest, 100 = most distant). For each social distance, participants chose between giving $100 to the other person and receiving $0/$20/$40/$60/$80/$100/$120 for themselves alone. They made the same decision for their favorite charity. Contrary to predictions, there were no significant age differences in social discounting rates, generosity across social distances, and charitable giving (ps >.05). Regardless of age, charitable giving was positively associated with generosity across social distances (ρ = .39, p < .001). This pattern of effects remained robust after controlling for demographics. Findings suggest that age differences in social discounting may be sensitive to cultural setting and methodological factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1876
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age Differences in Social Discounting and Charitable Giving in a U.S. Sample

Yi Lu, Corinna E. Löckenhoff
Innovation in Aging
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Age Differences in Social Discounting and Charitable Giving in a U.S. Sample

Yi Lu, Corinna E. Löckenhoff
article en

Abstract

Abstract Social discounting describes the tendency to show less generosity as social distance to the recipient increases. Prior studies examining age differences in social discounting suggest that older age is associated with greater generosity toward distant others (Pornpattananangkul et al., 2019; Gong et al., 2019). However, the generalizability of these findings is limited due to small sample sizes, comparisons of extreme age groups, and an exclusive focus on Asian samples. To address these gaps, a pre-registered study examined age differences in social discounting and charitable giving in a U.S. adult life-span sample (N = 432, aged 18-93, Mage = 51.23, SDage = 18.92, 50% female, 55% non-Hispanic White). We predicted that older age would be associated with lower social discounting and increased generosity across social distances and towards charities. The social discounting measure was adapted from Jones and Rachlin (2006) and involved five social distances (1/5/10/50/100, ranging from 0 = closest, 100 = most distant). For each social distance, participants chose between giving $100 to the other person and receiving $0/$20/$40/$60/$80/$100/$120 for themselves alone. They made the same decision for their favorite charity. Contrary to predictions, there were no significant age differences in social discounting rates, generosity across social distances, and charitable giving (ps >.05). Regardless of age, charitable giving was positively associated with generosity across social distances (ρ = .39, p < .001). This pattern of effects remained robust after controlling for demographics. Findings suggest that age differences in social discounting may be sensitive to cultural setting and methodological factors.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.