Surface tension enhancement in nanoconfined water: The role of confinement and excluded volume effects

In this work, the surface tension (γ) of nanoconfined water between planar interfaces was evaluated using atomistic simulations combined with the test-area method. To elucidate the role of spatial restriction, two types of confinement were considered: solid and liquid. In the case of solid surfaces, a strong increase in surface tension was observed compared to the unconfined case-i.e., water in contact with a single interface. In contrast, no significant change in surface tension was found under hydrophobic liquid confinement, indicating that spatial restriction alone does not fully account for the increase in γ. Our results demonstrate that the enhancement of surface tension arises from a synergistic interplay between confinement and excluded volume effects, amplified by a lack of miscibility between the two phases. These findings highlight the importance of interfacial structure and phase compatibility in determining the interfacial properties of confined fluids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. E
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/fmnj-d2gy
Primary Topic
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface tension enhancement in nanoconfined water: The role of confinement and excluded volume effects

Anonymous
Physical review. E
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
article

Surface tension enhancement in nanoconfined water: The role of confinement and excluded volume effects

Anonymous
article en

Abstract

In this work, the surface tension (γ) of nanoconfined water between planar interfaces was evaluated using atomistic simulations combined with the test-area method. To elucidate the role of spatial restriction, two types of confinement were considered: solid and liquid. In the case of solid surfaces, a strong increase in surface tension was observed compared to the unconfined case-i.e., water in contact with a single interface. In contrast, no significant change in surface tension was found under hydrophobic liquid confinement, indicating that spatial restriction alone does not fully account for the increase in γ. Our results demonstrate that the enhancement of surface tension arises from a synergistic interplay between confinement and excluded volume effects, amplified by a lack of miscibility between the two phases. These findings highlight the importance of interfacial structure and phase compatibility in determining the interfacial properties of confined fluids.

Physical review. EVol. 113(1)
Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Paris-Est Sup (FR), Institut de Physique de Rennes (FR), Institut de Chimie et des Matériaux Paris-Est (FR), Université de Rennes (FR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Surface tension enhancement in nanoconfined water: The role of confinement and excluded volume effects — Anonymous · Physical review. E (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS