Addressing Structural and Personal Barriers to Enhance Diversity in STEM Fields

Abstract As the U.S. population rapidly ages, the need for a diverse and highly trained MSTEM (Medicine, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) workforce with expertise in aging science has never been greater. By 2030, adults over 65 will comprise more than 21% of the population, requiring innovative solutions in healthcare, biotechnology, and engineering (Colby & Ortman, 2014; Vespa et al., 2020). However, despite the increasing diversity of the population, MSTEM fields continue to lack representation from underrepresented minority students, first-generation students, and those from disadvantaged backgrounds (National Science Foundation, 2019). Much of the research on STEM disparities focuses on structural barriers, including financial constraints, access to advanced coursework, and systemic bias in academic institutions. However, personal barriers such as self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and psychological well being are often overlooked, despite their significant role in persistence and success (Matthews et al., 2020). Without a sense of belonging or personal confidence in their abilities, underrepresented MSTEM students may internalize failure, contributing to the “leaky pipeline” in STEM education. This study employs semi-structured interviews with 12 students participating in a two-year program focused on aging research. Students were asked seven open-ended questions about their experiences. The questions explored belonging/identity, and self-efficacy. Interviews were recorded for transcription and coding purposes. Results indicate that the two-year program significantly enhanced students’ sense of belonging by fostering a supportive community of individuals with shared goals and aspirations. Mentorship contributed to increased self-efficacy, and students reported feeling supported, attributing the program to improvements in their well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3260
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing Structural and Personal Barriers to Enhance Diversity in STEM Fields

Melanie Horn Mallers, Laura A. Zettel-Watson, Jennifer Piazza, Maeva Laflamme
Innovation in Aging
Career Development and Diversity
article

Addressing Structural and Personal Barriers to Enhance Diversity in STEM Fields

Melanie Horn Mallers, Laura A. Zettel-Watson, Jennifer Piazza, Maeva Laflamme
article en

Abstract

Abstract As the U.S. population rapidly ages, the need for a diverse and highly trained MSTEM (Medicine, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) workforce with expertise in aging science has never been greater. By 2030, adults over 65 will comprise more than 21% of the population, requiring innovative solutions in healthcare, biotechnology, and engineering (Colby & Ortman, 2014; Vespa et al., 2020). However, despite the increasing diversity of the population, MSTEM fields continue to lack representation from underrepresented minority students, first-generation students, and those from disadvantaged backgrounds (National Science Foundation, 2019). Much of the research on STEM disparities focuses on structural barriers, including financial constraints, access to advanced coursework, and systemic bias in academic institutions. However, personal barriers such as self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and psychological well being are often overlooked, despite their significant role in persistence and success (Matthews et al., 2020). Without a sense of belonging or personal confidence in their abilities, underrepresented MSTEM students may internalize failure, contributing to the “leaky pipeline” in STEM education. This study employs semi-structured interviews with 12 students participating in a two-year program focused on aging research. Students were asked seven open-ended questions about their experiences. The questions explored belonging/identity, and self-efficacy. Interviews were recorded for transcription and coding purposes. Results indicate that the two-year program significantly enhanced students’ sense of belonging by fostering a supportive community of individuals with shared goals and aspirations. Mentorship contributed to increased self-efficacy, and students reported feeling supported, attributing the program to improvements in their well-being.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
California State University, Fullerton (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.