Research prioritization and societal accountability in corporatised healthcare services – What can Responsible Innovation offer?

In many parts of the world, an increasing number of clinical healthcare services are delivered through corporations. These corporations are also increasingly required to shape and undertake vital medical research. In this paper we outline the challenges of setting research priorities in corporatised clinics and ensuring that researchers are accountable to society and alert to the broader societal impacts of their work. We propose that the approach to research governance known as "Responsible Innovation" might provide a useful framework for selecting and shaping corporate research priorities so that they are grounded in population health priorities and wider social benefit. Responsible innovation also provides guidance for engaging patients, consumers, regulators and payers in constructive collaboration with researchers; encouraging ethical reflection by both corporations and individual scientists; and promoting responsiveness to contingencies in the processes, outcomes, and reception of research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accountability in Research
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2611383
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research prioritization and societal accountability in corporatised healthcare services – What can Responsible Innovation offer?

Sara A Attinger, Siun Gallagher, Ian Kerridge, Lipworth Wendy et al.
Accountability in Research
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Research prioritization and societal accountability in corporatised healthcare services – What can Responsible Innovation offer?

Sara A Attinger, Siun Gallagher, Ian Kerridge, Lipworth Wendy, R J Norman
article en

Abstract

In many parts of the world, an increasing number of clinical healthcare services are delivered through corporations. These corporations are also increasingly required to shape and undertake vital medical research. In this paper we outline the challenges of setting research priorities in corporatised clinics and ensuring that researchers are accountable to society and alert to the broader societal impacts of their work. We propose that the approach to research governance known as "Responsible Innovation" might provide a useful framework for selecting and shaping corporate research priorities so that they are grounded in population health priorities and wider social benefit. Responsible innovation also provides guidance for engaging patients, consumers, regulators and payers in constructive collaboration with researchers; encouraging ethical reflection by both corporations and individual scientists; and promoting responsiveness to contingencies in the processes, outcomes, and reception of research.

Accountability in ResearchVol. 33(4)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.