Psycho-educational programs: Enhancing coping strategies and mitigating anxiety in chemotherapy patients

Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of psycho-educational programs on enhancing coping strategies and mitigating anxiety in chemotherapy patients. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed using a non-randomised purposive sample of 225 patients receiving chemotherapy at the outpatient oncology clinic in Nasiriyah, Iraq. Data were collected using three tools: (I) an interviewing questionnaire for demographic and clinical data, (II) the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and (III) the Coping Strategies Adjustment to Cancer Patients Questionnaire (CSARQ). Results: The study reveals that 85% of patients report high levels of anxiety pre-program, which improved to 70% reporting low levels post-program. Regarding coping strategies, 82% of participants reported increased use of proactive coping strategies post-program, while approximately two-thirds continued to use passive strategies. Overall, 70.7% demonstrated high levels of total coping following the program compared to 29.3% reporting lower levels (p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in total anxiety, coping strategies, and demographic characteristics pre- and post-intervention. Conclusion: These findings highlight that psycho-educational programs incorporating coping strategies effectively reduce anxiety and enhance coping among chemotherapy patients. The development of standardised screening tools to assess the psychological status and mental well-being of all patients undergoing chemotherapy is strongly recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Babcock University Medical Journal
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38029/babcockuniv.med.j..v8i2.1071
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psycho-educational programs: Enhancing coping strategies and mitigating anxiety in chemotherapy patients

Marwa Jabbar Saiwan, Jaafar S. Al-Showaily
Babcock University Medical Journal
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Psycho-educational programs: Enhancing coping strategies and mitigating anxiety in chemotherapy patients

Marwa Jabbar Saiwan, Jaafar S. Al-Showaily
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of psycho-educational programs on enhancing coping strategies and mitigating anxiety in chemotherapy patients. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed using a non-randomised purposive sample of 225 patients receiving chemotherapy at the outpatient oncology clinic in Nasiriyah, Iraq. Data were collected using three tools: (I) an interviewing questionnaire for demographic and clinical data, (II) the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and (III) the Coping Strategies Adjustment to Cancer Patients Questionnaire (CSARQ). Results: The study reveals that 85% of patients report high levels of anxiety pre-program, which improved to 70% reporting low levels post-program. Regarding coping strategies, 82% of participants reported increased use of proactive coping strategies post-program, while approximately two-thirds continued to use passive strategies. Overall, 70.7% demonstrated high levels of total coping following the program compared to 29.3% reporting lower levels (p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in total anxiety, coping strategies, and demographic characteristics pre- and post-intervention. Conclusion: These findings highlight that psycho-educational programs incorporating coping strategies effectively reduce anxiety and enhance coping among chemotherapy patients. The development of standardised screening tools to assess the psychological status and mental well-being of all patients undergoing chemotherapy is strongly recommended.

Babcock University Medical JournalVol. 8(2)
Thi Qar University (IQ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.